EMIF vs. BN
EMIF (iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF) is Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index, while BN (Brookfield Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, EMIF returned 1.66%/yr vs 14.82%/yr for BN. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
EMIF vs. BN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMIF achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly higher than BN's -7.01% return. Over the past 10 years, EMIF has underperformed BN with an annualized return of 1.66%, while BN has yielded a comparatively higher 14.82% annualized return.
EMIF
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- -7.11%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 16.15%
- 3Y*
- 10.24%
- 5Y*
- 5.68%
- 10Y*
- 1.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.28%
BN
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- 6M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -7.01%
- 1Y
- -1.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 14.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $176.68M | $154.59M | $192.46M | |
| $49.09K | $40.45K | $71.84K |
EMIF vs. BN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMIF iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF | 0.44% | 33.90% | 1.21% | 5.67% | -12.59% | 3.76% | -19.98% | 16.36% | -13.70% | 20.70% |
BN Brookfield Corporation | -7.01% | 20.54% | 44.18% | 28.60% | -34.80% | 49.30% | 8.99% | 52.68% | -10.65% | 33.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMIF and BN is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2009 | 0.50 |
The correlation between EMIF and BN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMIF vs. BN — Risk / Return Rank
EMIF
BN
EMIF vs. BN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) and Brookfield Corporation (BN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMIF | BN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.00 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | -0.20 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.23 | -0.47 | +2.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMIF vs. BN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMIF drawdown since its inception was -48.02%, smaller than the maximum BN drawdown of -82.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIF and BN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMIF | BN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.02% | -82.22% | +34.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.71% | -22.05% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.70% | -27.84% | +11.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.29% | -41.85% | +18.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.02% | -51.42% | +3.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.57% | -13.21% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.89% | -28.46% | +12.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.00% | 9.06% | -2.06% |
Volatility
EMIF vs. BN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) is 4.41%, while Brookfield Corporation (BN) has a volatility of 6.14%. This indicates that EMIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMIF | BN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 6.14% | -1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.24% | 21.71% | -8.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 28.20% | -11.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 31.15% | -11.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.54% | 30.15% | -9.61% |
Dividends
EMIF vs. BN - Dividend Comparison
EMIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than BN's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BN Brookfield Corporation | 0.61% | 0.52% | 0.56% | 0.70% | 1.44% | 1.12% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.50% |
EMIF iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF | 4.21% | 4.96% | 4.12% | 2.64% | 3.08% | 3.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.64% | 2.58% | 3.16% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMIF and BN have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BN has higher volatility (6.14%) compared to EMIF (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMIF dropped -48.02% vs BN's -82.22%.
EMIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMIF and BN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer