EMIF vs. BN
EMIF (iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index, while BN (Brookfield Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, EMIF returned 2.46%/yr vs 15.46%/yr for BN. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
EMIF vs. BN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMIF achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly higher than BN's -3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, EMIF has underperformed BN with an annualized return of 2.46%, while BN has yielded a comparatively higher 15.46% annualized return.
EMIF
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 22.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.82%
- 5Y*
- 5.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.46%
BN
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- YTD
- -3.51%
- 6M
- -4.10%
- 1Y
- 13.04%
- 3Y*
- 29.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.33%
- 10Y*
- 15.46%
EMIF vs. BN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMIF iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF | 1.64% | 33.90% | 1.21% | 5.67% | -12.59% | 3.76% | -19.98% | 16.36% | -13.70% | 20.70% |
BN Brookfield Corporation | -3.51% | 20.54% | 44.18% | 28.60% | -34.80% | 49.30% | 8.99% | 52.68% | -10.65% | 33.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMIF and BN is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2009 | 0.50 |
The correlation between EMIF and BN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMIF vs. BN — Risk / Return Rank
EMIF
BN
EMIF vs. BN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) and Brookfield Corporation (BN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMIF | BN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.10 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 0.59 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.28 | 1.62 | +2.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMIF vs. BN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMIF drawdown since its inception was -48.02%, smaller than the maximum BN drawdown of -82.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIF and BN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMIF | BN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.02% | -82.22% | +34.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.57% | -22.05% | +6.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.70% | -27.84% | +11.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.29% | -41.85% | +18.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.02% | -51.42% | +3.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.54% | -9.95% | -2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.90% | -28.50% | +12.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.18% | 8.08% | -2.90% |
Volatility
EMIF vs. BN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) is 5.64%, while Brookfield Corporation (BN) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that EMIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMIF | BN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 7.00% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 22.54% | -9.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.03% | 28.73% | -12.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 31.29% | -11.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 30.17% | -9.55% |
Dividends
EMIF vs. BN - Dividend Comparison
EMIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than BN's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BN Brookfield Corporation | 0.59% | 0.52% | 0.56% | 0.70% | 1.44% | 1.12% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.50% |
EMIF iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF | 4.16% | 4.96% | 4.12% | 2.64% | 3.08% | 3.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.64% | 2.58% | 3.16% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMIF and BN have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BN has higher volatility (7.00%) compared to EMIF (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMIF dropped -48.02% vs BN's -82.22%.
EMIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMIF and BN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer