EMIF vs. SPY
EMIF (iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMIF is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMIF returned 2.52%/yr vs 15.57%/yr for SPY. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMIF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
EMIF vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMIF achieves a 3.33% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, EMIF has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 2.52%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.57% annualized return.
EMIF
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -5.41%
- YTD
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 2.75%
- 1Y
- 24.03%
- 3Y*
- 12.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
SPY
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 29.62%
- 3Y*
- 22.64%
- 5Y*
- 14.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
EMIF vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMIF iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF | 3.33% | 33.90% | 1.21% | 5.67% | -12.59% | 3.76% | -19.98% | 16.36% | -13.70% | 20.70% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11.69% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMIF and SPY is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2009 | 0.56 |
The correlation between EMIF and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (5 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EMIF vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMIF
SPY
Industrials
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Industrials
EMIF
SPY
Utilities
EMIF
SPY
Energy
EMIF
SPY
Basic Materials
EMIF
-
SPY
Communication Services
EMIF
-
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
EMIF
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
EMIF
-
SPY
Financial Services
EMIF
-
SPY
Healthcare
EMIF
-
SPY
Real Estate
EMIF
-
SPY
Technology
EMIF
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMIF vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
EMIF
SPY
EMIF vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMIF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | 2.52 | -0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | 3.42 | -1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.46 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 3.42 | -1.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.70 | 15.93 | -10.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMIF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 2.52 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.84 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | 0.87 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.59 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
EMIF vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMIF drawdown since its inception was -48.02%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIF and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMIF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.02% | -55.19% | +7.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.35% | -8.88% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.70% | -18.76% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.68% | -24.50% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.02% | -33.72% | -14.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.08% | 0.00% | -11.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.91% | -9.05% | -6.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.24% | 1.91% | +2.33% |
Volatility
EMIF vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.75%. This indicates that EMIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMIF | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 2.75% | +1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.87% | 8.89% | +3.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.32% | 11.81% | +3.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.66% | 17.05% | +2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 17.94% | +2.67% |
EMIF vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMIF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMIF vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
EMIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, more than SPY's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMIF iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF | 4.80% | 4.96% | 4.12% | 2.64% | 3.08% | 3.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.64% | 2.58% | 3.16% | 2.07% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.97% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMIF and SPY have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMIF has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to SPY (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMIF dropped -48.02% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.57% vs 2.52% for EMIF. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 2.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMIF.
EMIF has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 0.97% for SPY.
EMIF is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. EMIF tracks S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMIF and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMIF and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer