EMXF vs. EDIV
EMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF) and EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMXF tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Choice ESG Screened 5% Issuer Capped Index while EDIV tracks the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXF returned 7.15%/yr vs 10.66%/yr for EDIV. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMXF charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EDIV.
Performance
EMXF vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMXF achieves a 24.76% return, which is significantly higher than EDIV's 6.42% return.
EMXF
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 24.76%
- 6M
- 27.57%
- 1Y
- 47.21%
- 3Y*
- 21.67%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- —
EDIV
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 6.42%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 14.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.05%
- 5Y*
- 10.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.16%
EMXF vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF | 24.76% | 29.40% | 8.03% | 6.63% | -18.99% | 4.45% | 15.32% |
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 6.42% | 16.45% | 12.75% | 41.91% | -15.31% | 11.21% | 13.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMXF and EDIV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.70 |
The correlation between EMXF and EDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EMXF vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMXF
EDIV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Technology
EMXF
EDIV
Financial Services
EMXF
EDIV
Communication Services
EMXF
EDIV
Consumer Cyclical
EMXF
EDIV
Industrials
EMXF
EDIV
Healthcare
EMXF
EDIV
Consumer Defensive
EMXF
EDIV
Basic Materials
EMXF
EDIV
Real Estate
EMXF
EDIV
Utilities
EMXF
EDIV
Energy
EMXF
EDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMXF vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank
EMXF
EDIV
EMXF vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMXF | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.22 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 1.37 | +2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.56 | 4.23 | +10.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMXF | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 1.16 | +1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.78 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.17 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
EMXF vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMXF drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXF and EDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMXF | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.13% | -53.36% | +20.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.53% | -10.36% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.93% | -13.84% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.89% | -28.32% | -4.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -4.07% | +2.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -19.36% | +7.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 3.34% | -0.09% |
Volatility
EMXF vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) at 4.11%. This indicates that EMXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMXF | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 4.11% | +3.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.13% | 10.03% | +6.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.60% | 12.19% | +6.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.15% | 13.83% | +8.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 17.49% | +4.28% |
EMXF vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMXF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMXF vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison
EMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than EDIV's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.50% | 4.69% | 3.94% | 4.26% | 4.94% | 3.84% | 3.52% | 3.83% | 3.41% | 2.99% | 4.94% | 5.33% |
EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF | 2.75% | 3.43% | 2.92% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 1.87% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMXF and EDIV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMXF has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to EDIV (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXF dropped -33.13% vs EDIV's -53.36%.
On 5-year performance, EDIV leads with 10.66% vs 7.15% for EMXF. On fees, EMXF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EDIV has performed better with a 10.66% return vs 7.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMXF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.
EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 2.75% for EMXF.
EMXF tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Choice ESG Screened 5% Issuer Capped Index, while EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for EMXF and 0.49% for EDIV.
EMXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMXF and EDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer