EMXC vs. PIE
EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) and PIE (Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while PIE is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXC returned 12.76%/yr vs 7.01%/yr for PIE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMXC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for PIE.
Performance
EMXC vs. PIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 41.72% return, which is significantly higher than PIE's 39.11% return.
EMXC
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 12.61%
- YTD
- 41.72%
- 6M
- 46.94%
- 1Y
- 77.94%
- 3Y*
- 29.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- —
PIE
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 39.11%
- 6M
- 38.18%
- 1Y
- 70.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
EMXC vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 41.72% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 12.76% | 15.80% | -12.96% | 7.01% |
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 39.11% | 25.98% | -0.27% | 13.71% | -28.77% | 14.30% | 21.23% | 26.11% | -22.04% | 14.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMXC and PIE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2017 | 0.76 |
The correlation between EMXC and PIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMXC vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMXC
PIE
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
EMXC
PIE
Financial Services
EMXC
PIE
Industrials
EMXC
PIE
Basic Materials
EMXC
PIE
Consumer Cyclical
EMXC
PIE
Energy
EMXC
PIE
Communication Services
EMXC
PIE
Consumer Defensive
EMXC
PIE
Utilities
EMXC
PIE
Healthcare
EMXC
PIE
Real Estate
EMXC
PIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMXC vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank
EMXC
PIE
EMXC vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMXC | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.55 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.44 | 7.18 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.99 | 23.52 | -1.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMXC | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.61 | 3.24 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.35 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.12 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
EMXC vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and PIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMXC | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -72.98% | +30.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.41% | -9.87% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.12% | -28.69% | +9.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.91% | -40.32% | +11.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -1.17% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -26.08% | +15.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 3.01% | +0.55% |
Volatility
EMXC vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a higher volatility of 9.88% compared to Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) at 9.00%. This indicates that EMXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMXC | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.88% | 9.00% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.34% | 17.77% | +1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.70% | 21.91% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 20.23% | -2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.82% | 21.35% | -1.53% |
EMXC vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMXC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMXC vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison
EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than PIE's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 1.99% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.70% | 2.28% | 2.33% | 2.59% | 3.45% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 2.29% | 3.32% | 1.63% | 1.48% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMXC and PIE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMXC has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to PIE (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs PIE's -72.98%.
On 5-year performance, EMXC leads with 12.76% vs 7.01% for PIE. On fees, EMXC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, PIE has been the lower-risk option at 9.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMXC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.
EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.70% for PIE.
EMXC is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PIE is Momentum. EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EMXC and 0.90% for PIE.
EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 3.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMXC and PIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer