EMXC vs. BKEM

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) and BKEM (BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index while BKEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXC returned 11.85%/yr vs 6.67%/yr for BKEM. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMXC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for BKEM.

Performance

EMXC vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXC achieves a 32.80% return, which is significantly higher than BKEM's 22.14% return.

EMXC

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: -3.24%
• 6M: 26.73%
• YTD: 32.80%
• 1Y: 55.63%
• 3Y*: 24.38%
• 5Y*: 11.85%
• 10Y*: —

BKEM

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: -3.22%
• 6M: 16.09%
• YTD: 22.14%
• 1Y: 38.83%
• 3Y*: 19.62%
• 5Y*: 6.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXC vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	32.80%	35.14%	2.68%	18.96%	-19.56%	8.54%	53.16%
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF	22.14%	30.55%	7.53%	8.68%	-19.43%	-3.91%	48.44%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXC and BKEM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020	0.90

The correlation between EMXC and BKEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMXC vs. BKEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMXC	BKEM
Technology	52.4%	43.0%
Financial Services	17.4%	16.9%
Industrials	6.9%	8.1%
Basic Materials	6.0%	5.7%
Consumer Cyclical	4.1%	8.7%
Energy	3.4%	3.4%
Communication Services	3.0%	5.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	2.6%
Utilities	1.9%	2.0%
Healthcare	1.8%	2.7%
Real Estate	0.8%	1.1%

Return for Risk

EMXC vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXC

EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 82
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 83
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 84

BKEM

BKEM Risk / Return Rank: 67
BKEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BKEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BKEM Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BKEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BKEM Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXC vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMXC	BKEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	1.70	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	2.22	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.32	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.88	2.98	+0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.40	10.09	+3.30

EMXC vs. BKEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the BKEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXC and BKEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMXC vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXC drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than BKEM's maximum drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC and BKEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMXC	BKEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.81%	-39.48%	-3.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.41%	-13.11%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.12%	-18.38%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.91%	-33.89%	+4.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.90%	-7.51%	-2.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.13%	-15.80%	+5.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.16%	3.86%	+0.30%

Volatility

EMXC vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a higher volatility of 12.36% compared to BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) at 10.25%. This indicates that EMXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMXC	BKEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.36%	10.25%	+2.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.76%	20.99%	+3.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.41%	22.93%	+3.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.73%	19.51%	-0.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.37%	19.65%	+0.72%

EMXC vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMXC vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison

EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than BKEM's 1.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.92%	2.25%	2.76%	3.02%	3.15%	2.22%	1.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	2.00%	2.82%	2.69%	1.83%	2.85%	1.78%	1.45%	3.25%	2.63%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMXC and BKEM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, EMXC and BKEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EMXC or BKEM?

EMXC has higher volatility (12.36%) compared to BKEM (10.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXC dropped -42.81% vs BKEM's -39.48%.

Which ETF is better, EMXC or BKEM?

On 5-year performance, EMXC leads with 11.85% vs 6.67% for BKEM. On fees, BKEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, BKEM has been the lower-risk option at 10.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMXC or BKEM?

Over the 5-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 11.85% return vs 6.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMXC or BKEM?

BKEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMXC or BKEM?

EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.92% for BKEM.

What is the main difference between EMXC and BKEM?

EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while BKEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EMXC and 0.11% for BKEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.