EMTY vs. PLTZ
EMTY (ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF) and PLTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. EMTY is passively managed, while PLTZ is actively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMTY charges 0.66%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for PLTZ.
Performance
EMTY vs. PLTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMTY achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly lower than PLTZ's 4.28% return.
EMTY
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 1.09%
- 6M
- 3.80%
- 1Y
- 1.60%
- 3Y*
- -4.69%
- 5Y*
- -2.87%
- 10Y*
- —
PLTZ
- 1D
- 13.03%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 4.28%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMTY vs. PLTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF | 1.09% | -0.28% |
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF | 4.28% | -64.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMTY and PLTZ is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMTY vs. PLTZ — Risk / Return Rank
EMTY
PLTZ
EMTY vs. PLTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMTY | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.11 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.20 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMTY | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | -0.62 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
EMTY vs. PLTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMTY drawdown since its inception was -77.62%, which is greater than PLTZ's maximum drawdown of -70.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMTY and PLTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMTY | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.62% | -70.28% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.77% | -62.87% | -11.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.01% | -52.02% | -1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.11% | — | — |
Volatility
EMTY vs. PLTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMTY | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.40% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.71% | 101.99% | -84.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 101.99% | -79.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.67% | 101.99% | -76.32% |
EMTY vs. PLTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMTY has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTZ's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMTY vs. PLTZ - Dividend Comparison
EMTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, while PLTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF | 3.45% | 3.83% | 6.00% | 4.41% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.82% | 0.62% | 0.03% |
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMTY and PLTZ have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMTY is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMTY is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for PLTZ.
EMTY has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 0.00% for PLTZ.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for EMTY and 1.29% for PLTZ.
Find the right allocation for EMTY and PLTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer