PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMTL vs. XLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMTL vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMTL achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than XLU's 3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, EMTL has underperformed XLU with an annualized return of 3.38%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively higher 9.15% annualized return.


EMTL

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.89%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
7.09%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
3.38%

XLU

1D
-0.43%
1M
-5.74%
YTD
3.11%
6M
1.25%
1Y
9.11%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMTL vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMTL
SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF
0.74%8.27%5.86%9.60%-14.31%0.56%3.48%11.99%-2.37%7.59%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
3.11%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between EMTL and XLU is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2016

0.24

The correlation between EMTL and XLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.31 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMTL vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMTL
EMTL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
EMTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMTL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EMTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMTL Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMTL vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMTLXLUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.54

0.63

+1.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.76

0.94

+2.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.12

+0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

1.00

+1.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.06

2.24

+7.82

EMTL vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMTL Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMTL and XLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMTLXLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

0.63

+1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.54

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.48

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.40

+0.34

Drawdowns

EMTL vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMTL drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, smaller than the maximum XLU drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMTL and XLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMTLXLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.91%

-51.98%

+29.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.00%

-9.18%

+7.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.79%

-17.26%

+13.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-25.26%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.91%

-36.07%

+13.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-7.78%

+7.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-10.22%

+6.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

4.09%

-3.53%

Volatility

EMTL vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) is 0.67%, while State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that EMTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMTLXLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

5.41%

-4.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

11.53%

-9.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22%

14.57%

-12.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.88%

17.32%

-12.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.67%

19.26%

-14.59%

EMTL vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMTL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMTL vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

EMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, more than XLU's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMTL
SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF
4.95%5.09%5.34%4.78%4.19%5.43%3.28%3.96%3.35%4.16%8.87%0.00%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.72%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMTL and XLU have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLU has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to EMTL (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMTL dropped -22.91% vs XLU's -51.98%.

On 10-year performance, XLU leads with 9.15% vs 3.38% for EMTL. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, EMTL has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLU has performed better with a 9.15% return vs 3.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EMTL.

EMTL has the higher dividend yield at 4.95%, compared with 2.72% for XLU.

EMTL is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while XLU is Utilities Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EMTL and 0.08% for XLU.

EMTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMTL and XLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer