PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMR vs. MSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EMR vs. MSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMR achieves a 8.65% return, which is significantly higher than MSA's 0.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EMR having a 13.44% annualized return and MSA not far behind at 13.24%.


EMR

1D
0.69%
1M
4.27%
YTD
8.65%
6M
5.53%
1Y
14.74%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
13.44%

MSA

1D
0.25%
1M
-7.01%
YTD
0.42%
6M
-0.98%
1Y
-1.81%
3Y*
1.68%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
13.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMR vs. MSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
8.65%8.92%29.73%3.75%5.74%18.19%8.61%31.53%-11.87%29.05%
MSA
MSA Safety Incorporated
0.42%-2.14%-0.71%18.52%-3.15%2.14%19.79%36.10%23.61%13.97%

Correlation

The correlation between EMR and MSA is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.34

Over the past year, EMR and MSA have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.34, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

EMR:

$4.33

MSA:

$9.85

PE Ratio

EMR:

33.02

MSA:

16.23

PEG Ratio

EMR:

11.74

MSA:

0.06

PS Ratio

EMR:

4.41

MSA:

2.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

EMR:

$18.32B

MSA:

$1.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EMR:

$7.22B

MSA:

$897.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

EMR:

$3.87B

MSA:

$465.55M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMR vs. MSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMR
EMR Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
EMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
EMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMR Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

MSA
MSA Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMR vs. MSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMRMSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.01

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

-0.08

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.37

-0.18

+1.55

EMR vs. MSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMR Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is higher than the MSA Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMR and MSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMR vs. MSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMR drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, smaller than the maximum MSA drawdown of -70.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMR and MSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMRMSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-70.32%

+11.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.45%

-22.60%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.62%

-34.28%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-34.28%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.77%

-38.39%

-12.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.82%

-20.82%

+10.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.11%

-17.44%

+3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.79%

10.15%

+0.64%

Volatility

EMR vs. MSA - Volatility Comparison

Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) has a higher volatility of 9.08% compared to MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) at 7.25%. This indicates that EMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMRMSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.08%

7.25%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.24%

17.89%

+7.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.47%

24.14%

+6.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.36%

24.75%

+2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.14%

28.78%

+0.36%

Dividends

EMR vs. MSA - Dividend Comparison

EMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than MSA's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
1.53%1.61%1.70%2.14%2.15%2.18%2.49%2.58%3.26%2.76%3.42%3.94%
MSA
MSA Safety Incorporated
1.33%1.31%1.21%1.11%1.26%1.16%1.14%1.30%1.58%1.78%1.89%2.92%

Financials

EMR vs. MSA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Emerson Electric Co. and MSA Safety Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
4.56B
463.63M
(EMR) Total Revenue
(MSA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EMR vs. MSA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Emerson Electric Co. and MSA Safety Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%202220232024202520260
47.4%
Portfolio components
EMR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emerson Electric Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported a gross profit of 219.58M and revenue of 463.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.4%.

EMR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emerson Electric Co. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 4.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

MSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported an operating income of 93.01M and revenue of 463.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

EMR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emerson Electric Co. reported a net income of 618.00M and revenue of 4.56B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.

MSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported a net income of 71.27M and revenue of 463.63M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EMR and MSA have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMR has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to MSA (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMR dropped -59.05% vs MSA's -70.32%.

EMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMR and MSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer