MSA vs. VONG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MSA (MSA Safety Incorporated) is a stock, while VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Over the past 10 years, MSA returned 13.94%/yr vs 18.39%/yr for VONG. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

MSA vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSA achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 1.56% return. Over the past 10 years, MSA has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 13.94%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.39% annualized return.

MSA

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: -4.85%
• YTD: 2.16%
• 6M: 1.19%
• 1Y: -1.05%
• 3Y*: 1.26%
• 5Y*: 1.22%
• 10Y*: 13.94%

VONG

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: -3.99%
• YTD: 1.56%
• 6M: 0.27%
• 1Y: 18.03%
• 3Y*: 21.88%
• 5Y*: 13.07%
• 10Y*: 18.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSA vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MSA MSA Safety Incorporated	2.16%	-2.14%	-0.71%	18.52%	-3.15%	2.14%	19.79%	36.10%	23.61%	13.97%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	1.56%	18.45%	33.20%	42.67%	-29.18%	27.60%	38.30%	36.06%	-1.53%	30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between MSA and VONG is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010	0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between MSA and VONG has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MSA vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSA

MSA Risk / Return Rank: 38
MSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
MSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
MSA Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
MSA Martin Ratio Rank: 40

VONG

VONG Risk / Return Rank: 29
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSA vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSA	VONG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.04	1.12	-1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.11	1.58	-1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.20	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.05	1.12	-1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.10	3.64	-3.74

MSA vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSA Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSA and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSA vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSA drawdown since its inception was -70.32%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSA and VONG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSA	VONG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.32%	-32.72%	-37.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.60%	-16.23%	-6.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.28%	-23.27%	-11.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.28%	-32.72%	-1.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.39%	-32.72%	-5.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.44%	-6.82%	-12.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.44%	-4.88%	-12.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.58%	4.97%	+5.61%

Volatility

MSA vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) has a higher volatility of 6.97% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 6.04%. This indicates that MSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSA	VONG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.97%	6.04%	+0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.82%	12.59%	+5.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.19%	16.17%	+8.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.73%	21.45%	+3.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.70%	20.92%	+7.78%

Dividends

MSA vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

MSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, more than VONG's 0.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSA MSA Safety Incorporated	1.31%	1.31%	1.21%	1.11%	1.26%	1.16%	1.14%	1.30%	1.58%	1.78%	1.89%	2.92%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.47%	0.45%	0.55%	0.71%	0.98%	0.58%	0.77%	1.03%	1.18%	1.19%	1.48%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSA and VONG in my portfolio?

MSA and VONG have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSA or VONG?

MSA has higher volatility (6.97%) compared to VONG (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSA dropped -70.32% vs VONG's -32.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VONG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.