EMQQ vs. SPEM
EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) and SPEM (SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMQQ tracks the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index while SPEM tracks the S&P Emerging BMI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMQQ returned 4.32%/yr vs 9.62%/yr for SPEM. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SPEM.
Performance
EMQQ vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -24.03% return, which is significantly lower than SPEM's 11.15% return. Over the past 10 years, EMQQ has underperformed SPEM with an annualized return of 4.32%, while SPEM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.62% annualized return.
EMQQ
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -24.03%
- 6M
- -23.90%
- 1Y
- -21.65%
- 3Y*
- 3.56%
- 5Y*
- -12.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.32%
SPEM
- 1D
- -3.05%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- 28.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 9.62%
EMQQ vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -24.03% | 20.66% | 13.79% | 4.48% | -30.70% | -32.53% | 80.45% | 33.86% | -29.82% | 68.20% |
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 11.15% | 25.63% | 11.40% | 10.51% | -17.90% | 1.51% | 14.55% | 19.69% | -13.26% | 34.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQQ and SPEM is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2014 | 0.82 |
The correlation between EMQQ and SPEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMQQ vs. SPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMQQ
SPEM
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
EMQQ
SPEM
Technology
EMQQ
SPEM
Communication Services
EMQQ
SPEM
Financial Services
EMQQ
SPEM
Real Estate
EMQQ
SPEM
Utilities
EMQQ
SPEM
Industrials
EMQQ
SPEM
Consumer Defensive
EMQQ
SPEM
Healthcare
EMQQ
SPEM
Basic Materials
EMQQ
-
SPEM
Energy
EMQQ
-
SPEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMQQ vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank
EMQQ
SPEM
EMQQ vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMQQ | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.31 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 2.49 | -3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 8.92 | -10.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMQQ vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than SPEM's maximum drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and SPEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQQ | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.24% | -64.41% | -8.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.55% | -11.36% | -21.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.55% | -17.62% | -14.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.31% | -31.75% | -34.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.24% | -36.06% | -37.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.98% | -3.05% | -56.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.47% | -14.72% | -16.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.56% | 3.17% | +13.39% |
Volatility
EMQQ vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) is 5.99%, while SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) has a volatility of 7.51%. This indicates that EMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMQQ | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 7.51% | -1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.76% | 14.76% | +2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.77% | 17.03% | +3.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.14% | 17.35% | +15.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.61% | 18.80% | +11.81% |
EMQQ vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEM's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMQQ vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison
EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than SPEM's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 4.07% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 2.52% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 3.38% | 3.14% | 1.92% | 2.94% | 2.34% | 1.12% | 1.51% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMQQ and SPEM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPEM has higher volatility (7.51%) compared to EMQQ (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs SPEM's -64.41%.
On 10-year performance, SPEM leads with 9.62% vs 4.32% for EMQQ. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, EMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPEM has performed better with a 9.62% return vs 4.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPEM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.
EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 2.52% for SPEM.
EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while SPEM tracks S&P Emerging BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.07% for SPEM.
SPEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMQQ and SPEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer