PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMQQ vs. NETL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMQQ vs. NETL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -17.59% return, which is significantly lower than NETL's 11.61% return.


EMQQ

1D
1.06%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
-17.59%
6M
-19.58%
1Y
-13.29%
3Y*
6.20%
5Y*
-10.61%
10Y*
4.86%

NETL

1D
0.78%
1M
-1.07%
YTD
11.61%
6M
11.02%
1Y
12.68%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMQQ vs. NETL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMQQ
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF
-17.59%20.66%13.79%4.48%-30.70%-32.53%80.45%12.40%
NETL
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF
11.61%6.05%-1.08%2.69%-16.16%27.36%-0.73%13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between EMQQ and NETL is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019

0.27

The correlation between EMQQ and NETL shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EMQQ vs. NETL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMQQ
NETL

Consumer Cyclical

33.1%

-

Technology

8.2%

-

Communication Services

6.8%

-

Financial Services

3.6%

-

Real Estate

2.7%
100.0%

Utilities

0.4%

-

Industrials

0.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.2%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

EMQQ
33.1%
NETL

-

Technology

EMQQ
8.2%
NETL

-

Communication Services

EMQQ
6.8%
NETL

-

Financial Services

EMQQ
3.6%
NETL

-

Real Estate

EMQQ
2.7%
NETL
100.0%

Utilities

EMQQ
0.4%
NETL

-

Industrials

EMQQ
0.3%
NETL

-

Consumer Defensive

EMQQ
0.2%
NETL

-

Healthcare

EMQQ
0.0%
NETL

-

Basic Materials

EMQQ

-

NETL

-

Energy

EMQQ

-

NETL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMQQ vs. NETL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMQQ
EMQQ Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
EMQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EMQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

NETL
NETL Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
NETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
NETL Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
NETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
NETL Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMQQ vs. NETL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMQQNETLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.65

0.94

-1.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.84

1.37

-2.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.16

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

1.38

-1.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.83

4.37

-5.20

EMQQ vs. NETL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMQQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the NETL Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMQQ and NETL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMQQNETLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.65

0.94

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

0.09

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.20

-0.10

Drawdowns

EMQQ vs. NETL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than NETL's maximum drawdown of -51.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and NETL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMQQNETLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.24%

-51.48%

-21.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.96%

-9.16%

-20.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.96%

-19.30%

-10.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.31%

-30.74%

-35.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.59%

-2.58%

-54.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.35%

-11.66%

-19.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.93%

2.90%

+12.03%

Volatility

EMQQ vs. NETL - Volatility Comparison

EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) at 3.66%. This indicates that EMQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NETL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMQQNETLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

3.66%

+2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.17%

9.59%

+6.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.46%

13.52%

+6.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.12%

17.93%

+15.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.60%

25.92%

+4.68%

EMQQ vs. NETL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than NETL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMQQ vs. NETL - Dividend Comparison

EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than NETL's 4.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMQQ
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF
3.75%3.09%1.70%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.18%1.29%0.00%0.94%0.75%0.08%
NETL
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF
4.78%5.12%5.08%4.57%4.47%4.03%3.98%2.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMQQ and NETL have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMQQ has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to NETL (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs NETL's -51.48%.

On 5-year performance, NETL leads with 1.63% vs -10.61% for EMQQ. On fees, NETL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, NETL has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NETL has performed better with a 1.63% return vs -10.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NETL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.

NETL has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 3.75% for EMQQ.

EMQQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while NETL is REIT. EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while NETL tracks Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.60% for NETL.

NETL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMQQ and NETL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer