EMQQ vs. NETL
EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) and NETL (NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMQQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while NETL is a REIT fund tracking the Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMQQ returned -10.61%/yr vs 1.63%/yr for NETL. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for NETL.
Performance
EMQQ vs. NETL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -17.59% return, which is significantly lower than NETL's 11.61% return.
EMQQ
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- -17.59%
- 6M
- -19.58%
- 1Y
- -13.29%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- -10.61%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
NETL
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 11.61%
- 6M
- 11.02%
- 1Y
- 12.68%
- 3Y*
- 7.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- —
EMQQ vs. NETL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -17.59% | 20.66% | 13.79% | 4.48% | -30.70% | -32.53% | 80.45% | 12.40% |
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 11.61% | 6.05% | -1.08% | 2.69% | -16.16% | 27.36% | -0.73% | 13.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQQ and NETL is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019 | 0.27 |
The correlation between EMQQ and NETL shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EMQQ vs. NETL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMQQ
NETL
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
EMQQ
NETL
-
Technology
EMQQ
NETL
-
Communication Services
EMQQ
NETL
-
Financial Services
EMQQ
NETL
-
Real Estate
EMQQ
NETL
Utilities
EMQQ
NETL
-
Industrials
EMQQ
NETL
-
Consumer Defensive
EMQQ
NETL
-
Healthcare
EMQQ
NETL
-
Basic Materials
EMQQ
-
NETL
-
Energy
EMQQ
-
NETL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMQQ vs. NETL — Risk / Return Rank
EMQQ
NETL
EMQQ vs. NETL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMQQ | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | 0.94 | -1.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | 1.37 | -2.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.16 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 1.38 | -1.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 4.37 | -5.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMQQ | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.65 | 0.94 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 | 0.09 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.20 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
EMQQ vs. NETL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than NETL's maximum drawdown of -51.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and NETL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQQ | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.24% | -51.48% | -21.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.96% | -9.16% | -20.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.96% | -19.30% | -10.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.31% | -30.74% | -35.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.59% | -2.58% | -54.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.35% | -11.66% | -19.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.93% | 2.90% | +12.03% |
Volatility
EMQQ vs. NETL - Volatility Comparison
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) at 3.66%. This indicates that EMQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NETL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMQQ | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.58% | 3.66% | +2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.17% | 9.59% | +6.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.46% | 13.52% | +6.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.12% | 17.93% | +15.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.60% | 25.92% | +4.68% |
EMQQ vs. NETL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than NETL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMQQ vs. NETL - Dividend Comparison
EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than NETL's 4.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 3.75% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 4.78% | 5.12% | 5.08% | 4.57% | 4.47% | 4.03% | 3.98% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMQQ and NETL have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMQQ has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to NETL (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs NETL's -51.48%.
On 5-year performance, NETL leads with 1.63% vs -10.61% for EMQQ. On fees, NETL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, NETL has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NETL has performed better with a 1.63% return vs -10.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NETL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.
NETL has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 3.75% for EMQQ.
EMQQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while NETL is REIT. EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while NETL tracks Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.60% for NETL.
NETL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMQQ and NETL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer