EMQQ vs. HTEC
EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) and HTEC (ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMQQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while HTEC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMQQ returned -12.41%/yr vs -5.86%/yr for HTEC. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for HTEC.
Performance
EMQQ vs. HTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -24.03% return, which is significantly lower than HTEC's -0.55% return.
EMQQ
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -24.03%
- 6M
- -23.90%
- 1Y
- -21.65%
- 3Y*
- 3.56%
- 5Y*
- -12.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.32%
HTEC
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 6M
- -2.52%
- 1Y
- 28.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.38%
- 5Y*
- -5.86%
- 10Y*
- —
EMQQ vs. HTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -24.03% | 20.66% | 13.79% | 4.48% | -30.70% | -32.53% | 80.45% | 11.91% |
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | -0.55% | 23.91% | 2.68% | -2.94% | -33.72% | -0.28% | 65.01% | 8.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQQ and HTEC is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2019 | 0.59 |
The correlation between EMQQ and HTEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EMQQ vs. HTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMQQ
HTEC
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
EMQQ
HTEC
-
Technology
EMQQ
HTEC
Communication Services
EMQQ
HTEC
-
Financial Services
EMQQ
HTEC
Real Estate
EMQQ
HTEC
-
Utilities
EMQQ
HTEC
-
Industrials
EMQQ
HTEC
Consumer Defensive
EMQQ
HTEC
-
Healthcare
EMQQ
HTEC
Basic Materials
EMQQ
-
HTEC
-
Energy
EMQQ
-
HTEC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMQQ vs. HTEC — Risk / Return Rank
EMQQ
HTEC
EMQQ vs. HTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMQQ | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.24 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 1.77 | -2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 4.22 | -5.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMQQ vs. HTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than HTEC's maximum drawdown of -57.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and HTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQQ | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.24% | -57.53% | -15.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.55% | -16.31% | -16.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.55% | -28.67% | -3.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.31% | -56.10% | -10.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.98% | -31.59% | -28.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.47% | -29.00% | -2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.56% | 6.81% | +9.75% |
Volatility
EMQQ vs. HTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) is 5.99%, while ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that EMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMQQ | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 6.74% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.76% | 15.77% | +0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.77% | 20.92% | -0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.14% | 24.50% | +8.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.61% | 25.46% | +5.15% |
EMQQ vs. HTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than HTEC's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMQQ vs. HTEC - Dividend Comparison
EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than HTEC's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 4.07% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 0.99% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMQQ and HTEC have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HTEC has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to EMQQ (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs HTEC's -57.53%.
On 5-year performance, HTEC leads with -5.86% vs -12.41% for EMQQ. On fees, HTEC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, EMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HTEC has performed better with a -5.86% return vs -12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HTEC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.
EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 0.99% for HTEC.
EMQQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while HTEC is Health & Biotech Equities. EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while HTEC tracks ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.68% for HTEC.
HTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMQQ and HTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer