EMQQ vs. EMDM
EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) and EMDM (First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMQQ tracks the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index while EMDM tracks the Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMQQ returned 4.26%/yr vs 28.08%/yr for EMDM. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EMQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for EMDM.
Performance
EMQQ vs. EMDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -13.58% return, which is significantly lower than EMDM's 28.39% return.
EMQQ
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 9.20%
- 6M
- -12.37%
- YTD
- -13.58%
- 1Y
- -10.75%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- -6.86%
- 10Y*
- 4.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.19%
EMDM
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- 6M
- 12.42%
- YTD
- 28.39%
- 1Y
- 66.69%
- 3Y*
- 28.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $370.33K | $752.09K | $541.22K | |
| $1.08M | $1.14M | $1.73M |
EMQQ vs. EMDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -13.58% | 20.66% | 13.79% | -2.03% |
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF | 28.39% | 59.68% | -4.93% | 14.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQQ and EMDM is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2023 | 0.65 |
The correlation between EMQQ and EMDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMQQ vs. EMDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMQQ
EMDM
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
EMQQ
EMDM
Technology
EMQQ
EMDM
Communication Services
EMQQ
EMDM
Financial Services
EMQQ
EMDM
Real Estate
EMQQ
EMDM
-
Industrials
EMQQ
EMDM
Utilities
EMQQ
EMDM
Consumer Defensive
EMQQ
EMDM
Healthcare
EMQQ
EMDM
Basic Materials
EMQQ
-
EMDM
Energy
EMQQ
-
EMDM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMQQ vs. EMDM — Risk / Return Rank
EMQQ
EMDM
EMQQ vs. EMDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMQQ | EMDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.42 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 4.28 | -4.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | 13.58 | -14.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMQQ vs. EMDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than EMDM's maximum drawdown of -18.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and EMDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQQ | EMDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.24% | -18.81% | -54.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.70% | -15.65% | -18.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.70% | -18.81% | -14.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.48% | -10.51% | -43.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.72% | -4.21% | -27.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.02% | 4.93% | +14.09% |
Volatility
EMQQ vs. EMDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) is 5.25%, while First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) has a volatility of 9.92%. This indicates that EMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMQQ | EMDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 9.92% | -4.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.86% | 25.36% | -8.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.22% | 27.91% | -6.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.73% | 21.15% | +11.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.60% | 21.15% | +9.45% |
EMQQ vs. EMDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than EMDM's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMQQ vs. EMDM - Dividend Comparison
EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than EMDM's 2.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF | 2.95% | 3.57% | 5.87% | 2.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 3.57% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMQQ and EMDM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMDM has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to EMQQ (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs EMDM's -18.81%.
On 3-year performance, EMDM leads with 28.08% vs 4.26% for EMQQ. On fees, EMDM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, EMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EMDM has performed better with a 28.08% return vs 4.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMDM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.
EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 2.95% for EMDM.
EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while EMDM tracks Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.75% for EMDM.
EMDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMQQ and EMDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer