PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMQQ vs. DEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMQQ vs. DEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -13.58% return, which is significantly lower than DEM's 17.69% return. Over the past 10 years, EMQQ has underperformed DEM with an annualized return of 4.66%, while DEM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.05% annualized return.


EMQQ

1D
1.45%
1M
9.20%
6M
-12.37%
YTD
-13.58%
1Y
-10.75%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
-6.86%
10Y*
4.66%
ALL TIME*
3.19%

DEM

1D
0.52%
1M
1.12%
6M
10.61%
YTD
17.69%
1Y
25.38%
3Y*
17.15%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
9.05%
ALL TIME*
4.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.16M$9.32M$10.88M
$1.08M$1.14M$1.73M

EMQQ vs. DEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMQQ
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF
-13.58%20.66%13.79%4.48%-30.70%-32.53%80.45%33.86%-29.82%68.20%
DEM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
17.69%21.29%4.46%20.93%-10.43%11.49%-5.84%19.84%-7.69%26.26%

Correlation

The correlation between EMQQ and DEM is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2014

0.65

The correlation between EMQQ and DEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.66 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EMQQ vs. DEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMQQ
DEM

Consumer Cyclical

33.1%
5.4%

Technology

7.5%
17.5%

Communication Services

6.9%
3.0%

Financial Services

3.6%
21.9%

Real Estate

2.7%
2.9%

Industrials

1.1%
8.9%

Utilities

0.4%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.2%
5.8%

Healthcare

0.0%
0.6%

Basic Materials

-

3.7%

Energy

-

6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EMQQ
33.1%
DEM
5.4%

Technology

EMQQ
7.5%
DEM
17.5%

Communication Services

EMQQ
6.9%
DEM
3.0%

Financial Services

EMQQ
3.6%
DEM
21.9%

Real Estate

EMQQ
2.7%
DEM
2.9%

Industrials

EMQQ
1.1%
DEM
8.9%

Utilities

EMQQ
0.4%
DEM
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

EMQQ
0.2%
DEM
5.8%

Healthcare

EMQQ
0.0%
DEM
0.6%

Basic Materials

EMQQ

-

DEM
3.7%

Energy

EMQQ

-

DEM
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMQQ vs. DEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMQQ
EMQQ Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
EMQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
EMQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

DEM
DEM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMQQ vs. DEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMQQDEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.31

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

3.23

-3.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.57

9.72

-10.29

EMQQ vs. DEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMQQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the DEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMQQ and DEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMQQ vs. DEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than DEM's maximum drawdown of -51.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and DEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMQQDEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.24%

-51.85%

-21.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.70%

-7.89%

-25.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.70%

-15.64%

-18.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.70%

-27.18%

-34.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.24%

-37.79%

-35.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.48%

-3.06%

-51.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.72%

-12.82%

-18.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.02%

2.62%

+16.40%

Volatility

EMQQ vs. DEM - Volatility Comparison

EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) have volatilities of 5.25% and 5.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMQQDEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

5.13%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.86%

13.19%

+3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.22%

15.02%

+6.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.73%

15.61%

+17.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.60%

17.86%

+12.74%

EMQQ vs. DEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than DEM's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMQQ vs. DEM - Dividend Comparison

EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than DEM's 4.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
4.16%4.88%5.24%5.49%8.62%5.87%4.21%4.78%4.47%3.67%3.63%5.21%
EMQQ
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF
3.57%3.09%1.70%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.18%1.29%0.00%0.94%0.75%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMQQ and DEM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMQQ has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to DEM (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs DEM's -51.85%.

On 10-year performance, DEM leads with 9.05% vs 4.66% for EMQQ. On fees, DEM is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, DEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DEM has performed better with a 9.05% return vs 4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DEM is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.

DEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 3.57% for EMQQ.

EMQQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DEM is Dividend. EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while DEM tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.63% for DEM.

DEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMQQ and DEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer