EMOP vs. USL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMOP (AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - EMOP is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. EMOP is actively managed, while USL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. EMOP charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.

Performance

EMOP vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMOP achieves a 32.56% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return.

EMOP

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 8.86%
• YTD: 32.56%
• 6M: 34.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USL

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: -1.61%
• YTD: 63.07%
• 6M: 59.66%
• 1Y: 57.86%
• 3Y*: 18.42%
• 5Y*: 17.41%
• 10Y*: 10.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMOP vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	32.56%	16.69%
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP	63.07%	-14.15%

Correlation

The correlation between EMOP and USL is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025	-0.22

EMOP vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMOP	USL
Technology	30.3%	-
Financial Services	24.0%	4.5%
Communication Services	12.3%	-
Industrials	8.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	-
Basic Materials	7.0%	-
Utilities	2.8%	-
Energy	2.6%	-
Real Estate	2.3%	-
Healthcare	1.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

EMOP vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USL

USL Risk / Return Rank: 56
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 54
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMOP vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMOP	USL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.93	0.01	+2.92

Drawdowns

EMOP vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMOP drawdown since its inception was -12.88%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMOP and USL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMOP	USL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.88%	-89.06%	+76.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.76%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.33%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.82%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-66.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	-38.16%	+37.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.90%	-61.46%	+59.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.27%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMOP	USL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.53%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	23.33%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.85%	28.54%	-8.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.85%	30.08%	-10.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.85%	32.35%	-12.50%

EMOP vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMOP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMOP vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

EMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	0.82%	0.27%
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMOP and USL in my portfolio?

EMOP and USL have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMOP or USL?

On fees, EMOP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMOP or USL?

EMOP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMOP or USL?

EMOP has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

What is the main difference between EMOP and USL?

EMOP is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for EMOP and 0.88% for USL.