EMOP vs. BUFC
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) and AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC).
EMOP and BUFC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMOP is an actively managed fund by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jun 17, 2025. BUFC is an actively managed fund by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Dec 12, 2023.
Performance
EMOP vs. BUFC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMOP vs. BUFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 9.93% | 16.69% |
BUFC AB Conservative Buffer ETF | -1.39% | 5.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMOP achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than BUFC's -1.39% return.
EMOP
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 14.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFC
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- -1.39%
- 6M
- 0.25%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMOP vs. BUFC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMOP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFC's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMOP vs. BUFC — Risk / Return Rank
EMOP
BUFC
EMOP vs. BUFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) and AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMOP | BUFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.06 | 1.15 | +0.91 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMOP and BUFC is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EMOP vs. BUFC - Dividend Comparison
EMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while BUFC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 0.61% | 0.27% |
BUFC AB Conservative Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EMOP vs. BUFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMOP drawdown since its inception was -12.88%, which is greater than BUFC's maximum drawdown of -8.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMOP and BUFC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMOP | BUFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.88% | -8.29% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.79% | -2.35% | -5.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -0.78% | -1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.00% | — |
Volatility
EMOP vs. BUFC - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMOP | BUFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.23% | 7.31% | +10.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 5.77% | +12.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 5.77% | +12.46% |