EMOP vs. EMDV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMOP (AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) and EMDV (ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. EMOP is actively managed, while EMDV is passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMOP charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EMDV.

Performance

EMOP vs. EMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMOP achieves a 32.56% return, which is significantly higher than EMDV's 1.17% return.

EMOP

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 8.86%
• YTD: 32.56%
• 6M: 34.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMDV

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 1.17%
• 6M: 1.13%
• 1Y: 7.88%
• 3Y*: 2.77%
• 5Y*: -3.15%
• 10Y*: 2.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMOP vs. EMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	32.56%	16.69%
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	1.17%	6.88%

Correlation

The correlation between EMOP and EMDV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025	0.72

EMOP vs. EMDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMOP	EMDV
Technology	30.3%	22.5%
Financial Services	24.0%	24.1%
Communication Services	12.3%	6.2%
Industrials	8.1%	6.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	6.2%
Basic Materials	7.0%	1.9%
Utilities	2.8%	8.3%
Energy	2.6%	-
Real Estate	2.3%	-
Healthcare	1.6%	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	16.4%

Return for Risk

EMOP vs. EMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMDV

EMDV Risk / Return Rank: 22
EMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
EMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
EMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 20
EMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
EMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMOP vs. EMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMOP	EMDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.93	0.22	+2.72

Drawdowns

EMOP vs. EMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMOP drawdown since its inception was -12.88%, smaller than the maximum EMDV drawdown of -39.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMOP and EMDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMOP	EMDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.88%	-39.20%	+26.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.24%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.97%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	-14.80%	+14.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.90%	-13.55%	+11.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.37%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMOP	EMDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.17%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.21%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.85%	11.21%	+8.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.85%	15.42%	+4.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.85%	18.26%	+1.59%

EMOP vs. EMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMOP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than EMDV's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMOP vs. EMDV - Dividend Comparison

EMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than EMDV's 2.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	2.41%	2.46%	2.79%	1.88%	3.68%	2.12%	3.12%	2.38%	1.27%	2.09%	2.87%
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	0.82%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMOP and EMDV in my portfolio?

EMOP and EMDV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMOP or EMDV?

On fees, EMDV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMOP or EMDV?

EMDV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for EMOP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMOP or EMDV?

EMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.82% for EMOP.

What is the main difference between EMOP and EMDV?

They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for EMOP and 0.60% for EMDV.