EMNT vs. NWLG
EMNT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF) and NWLG (Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMNT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO, while NWLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Nuveen. Both are actively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMNT charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for NWLG.
Performance
EMNT vs. NWLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EMNT
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 5.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- —
NWLG
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMNT vs. NWLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF | 1.64% | 4.74% | 5.79% | 5.84% | -0.57% | -0.20% |
NWLG Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG ETF | -10.63% | 13.21% | 29.17% | 43.55% | -31.52% | 5.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMNT and NWLG is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2021 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMNT vs. NWLG — Risk / Return Rank
EMNT
NWLG
EMNT vs. NWLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) and Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG ETF (NWLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMNT | NWLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.63 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 33.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 235.99 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMNT | NWLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 4.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.51 | — | — |
Drawdowns
EMNT vs. NWLG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMNT | NWLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.23% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | — | — |
Volatility
EMNT vs. NWLG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMNT | NWLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.34% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.83% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.86% | — | — |
EMNT vs. NWLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMNT has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than NWLG's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMNT vs. NWLG - Dividend Comparison
EMNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than NWLG's 15.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF | 4.00% | 4.46% | 5.14% | 4.62% | 2.79% | 0.66% | 1.44% |
NWLG Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG ETF | 15.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMNT and NWLG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMNT is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMNT is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for NWLG.
NWLG has the higher dividend yield at 15.71%, compared with 4.00% for EMNT.
EMNT is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while NWLG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for EMNT and 0.64% for NWLG.
Find the right allocation for EMNT and NWLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer