EMNT vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMNT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EMNT returned 4.38% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMNT charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

EMNT vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EMNT having a 1.64% return and CSHP slightly lower at 1.63%.

EMNT

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 1.64%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 4.38%
• 3Y*: 5.24%
• 5Y*: 3.43%
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMNT vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF	1.64%	4.74%	2.43%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.63%	4.10%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between EMNT and CSHP is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024	0.09

Return for Risk

EMNT vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMNT

EMNT Risk / Return Rank: 99
EMNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
EMNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
EMNT Omega Ratio Rank: 99
EMNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
EMNT Martin Ratio Rank: 99

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMNT vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMNT	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	10.63	11.91	-1.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	21.17	31.26	-10.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	5.63	7.44	-1.81
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	33.45	65.71	-32.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	235.99	432.16	-196.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMNT vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMNT Sharpe Ratio is 10.63, which is comparable to the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMNT and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMNT	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.63	11.91	-1.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	4.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.51	10.75	-7.24

Drawdowns

EMNT vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMNT drawdown since its inception was -2.28%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMNT and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMNT	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.28%	-0.08%	-2.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.13%	-0.06%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	0.00%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.23%	-0.00%	-0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.02%	0.01%	+0.01%

Volatility

EMNT vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) has a higher volatility of 0.14% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that EMNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMNT	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.14%	0.07%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.34%	0.24%	+0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41%	0.33%	+0.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.83%	0.40%	+0.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.86%	0.40%	+0.46%

EMNT vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMNT has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EMNT vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

EMNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than CSHP's 3.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.92%	5.39%	1.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF	4.00%	4.46%	5.14%	4.62%	2.79%	0.66%	1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMNT and CSHP in my portfolio?

EMNT and CSHP have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMNT or CSHP?

EMNT has higher volatility (0.14%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMNT dropped -2.28% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, EMNT or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, EMNT leads with 4.38% vs 3.96% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMNT or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, EMNT has performed better with a 4.38% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMNT or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for EMNT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMNT or CSHP?

EMNT has the higher dividend yield at 4.00%, compared with 3.92% for CSHP.

What is the main difference between EMNT and CSHP?

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for EMNT and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs 10.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.