EMKT vs. XC
EMKT (Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) and XC (WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. EMKT is actively managed, while XC is passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMKT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for XC.
Performance
EMKT vs. XC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMKT achieves a 30.02% return, which is significantly higher than XC's -3.47% return.
EMKT
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 11.71%
- YTD
- 30.02%
- 6M
- 31.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XC
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- -3.47%
- 6M
- -2.10%
- 1Y
- 8.33%
- 3Y*
- 9.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMKT vs. XC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 30.02% | -1.29% |
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | -3.47% | 1.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMKT and XC is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMKT vs. XC — Risk / Return Rank
EMKT
XC
EMKT vs. XC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMKT | XC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.33 | 0.71 | +1.61 |
Drawdowns
EMKT vs. XC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMKT drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, smaller than the maximum XC drawdown of -20.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMKT and XC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMKT | XC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.21% | -20.97% | +6.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -9.35% | +7.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -4.12% | +1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.29% | — |
Volatility
EMKT vs. XC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMKT | XC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.46% | 14.78% | +7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.46% | 15.87% | +6.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.46% | 15.87% | +6.59% |
EMKT vs. XC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMKT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than XC's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMKT vs. XC - Dividend Comparison
EMKT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 12.41% | 11.74% | 1.49% | 1.42% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMKT and XC have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XC is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XC is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for EMKT.
XC has the higher dividend yield at 12.41%, compared with 0.00% for EMKT.
They also come from different issuers: Lazard and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for EMKT and 0.32% for XC.
Find the right allocation for EMKT and XC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer