EMKT vs. WTIU

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

EMKT (Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - EMKT is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Lazard, while WTIU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). EMKT is actively managed, while WTIU is passively managed. Their -0.27 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EMKT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for WTIU.

Performance

EMKT vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMKT achieves a 22.96% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 95.37% return.

EMKT

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: -0.13%
• 6M: 13.54%
• YTD: 22.96%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

WTIU

• 1D: -4.60%
• 1M: 39.23%
• 6M: 55.77%
• YTD: 95.37%
• 1Y: 104.76%
• 3Y*: -1.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -5.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	$362.94K	$359.48K	$607.32K
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	$1.41M	$930.94K	$851.49K

EMKT vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	22.96%	-1.26%
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	95.37%	-3.08%

Correlation

The correlation between EMKT and WTIU is -0.27, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025	-0.27

Return for Risk

EMKT vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMKT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WTIU

WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 55
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 54
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMKT vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMKT	WTIU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.51	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.99	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.25	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.19	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.99	—

Drawdowns

EMKT vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMKT drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, smaller than the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMKT and WTIU.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMKT	WTIU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.21%	-75.73%	+61.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-48.11%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-75.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.46%	-30.75%	+23.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.72%	-39.20%	+35.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	21.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMKT	WTIU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	22.17%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	57.97%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.76%	69.79%	-44.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.76%	70.86%	-45.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.76%	70.86%	-45.10%

EMKT vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMKT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMKT vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison

EMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, while WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	0.45%
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMKT and WTIU in my portfolio?

EMKT and WTIU have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMKT or WTIU?

On fees, EMKT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMKT or WTIU?

EMKT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTIU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMKT or WTIU?

EMKT has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.

What is the main difference between EMKT and WTIU?

EMKT is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while WTIU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Lazard and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for EMKT and 0.95% for WTIU.