EMKT vs. PIPE

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

EMKT (Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) and PIPE (Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMKT is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Lazard, while PIPE is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. EMKT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PIPE.

Performance

EMKT vs. PIPE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EMKT having a 25.98% return and PIPE slightly lower at 25.81%.

EMKT

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 3.85%
• YTD: 25.98%
• 6M: 26.41%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PIPE

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -4.93%
• YTD: 25.81%
• 6M: 26.13%
• 1Y: 28.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMKT vs. PIPE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	25.98%	-1.26%
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	25.81%	4.73%

Correlation

The correlation between EMKT and PIPE is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025	-0.14

Return for Risk

EMKT vs. PIPE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMKT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PIPE

PIPE Risk / Return Rank: 70
PIPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
PIPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
PIPE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
PIPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
PIPE Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMKT vs. PIPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMKT	PIPE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.98	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.68	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.34	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.92	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.59	—

Drawdowns

EMKT vs. PIPE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMKT drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, smaller than the maximum PIPE drawdown of -15.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMKT and PIPE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMKT	PIPE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.21%	-15.69%	+1.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.18%	-5.22%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.11%	-4.03%	+0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.99%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMKT	PIPE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.57%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.25%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.64%	14.56%	+10.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.64%	18.63%	+6.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.64%	18.63%	+6.01%

EMKT vs. PIPE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMKT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than PIPE's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMKT vs. PIPE - Dividend Comparison

EMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than PIPE's 3.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	0.44%	0.00%
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	3.77%	3.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMKT and PIPE in my portfolio?

EMKT and PIPE have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMKT or PIPE?

On fees, EMKT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMKT or PIPE?

EMKT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PIPE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMKT or PIPE?

PIPE has the higher dividend yield at 3.77%, compared with 0.44% for EMKT.

What is the main difference between EMKT and PIPE?

EMKT is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while PIPE is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Lazard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for EMKT and 0.75% for PIPE.