PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMKT vs. GLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMKT vs. GLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF (GLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMKT achieves a 30.02% return, which is significantly higher than GLIX's 9.30% return.


EMKT

1D
-1.45%
1M
11.71%
YTD
30.02%
6M
31.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLIX

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
9.30%
6M
8.79%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMKT vs. GLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EMKT and GLIX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMKT vs. GLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF (GLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EMKT vs. GLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMKTGLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.33

1.29

+1.03

Drawdowns

EMKT vs. GLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMKT drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, which is greater than GLIX's maximum drawdown of -7.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMKT and GLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMKTGLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.21%

-7.82%

-6.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-3.80%

+2.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-2.06%

-0.98%

Volatility

EMKT vs. GLIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMKTGLIXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.46%

11.94%

+10.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.46%

11.94%

+10.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.46%

11.94%

+10.52%

EMKT vs. GLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMKT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than GLIX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMKT vs. GLIX - Dividend Comparison

EMKT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EMKT and GLIX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMKT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMKT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GLIX.

GLIX has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.00% for EMKT.

EMKT is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while GLIX is Utilities Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for EMKT and 0.96% for GLIX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMKT and GLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer