PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMIF vs. EMXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMIF vs. EMXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMIF achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than EMXF's 24.76% return.


EMIF

1D
-1.54%
1M
-6.56%
YTD
1.74%
6M
0.79%
1Y
21.17%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
4.93%
10Y*
2.36%

EMXF

1D
-1.30%
1M
8.70%
YTD
24.76%
6M
27.57%
1Y
47.21%
3Y*
21.67%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMIF vs. EMXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EMIF
iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF
1.74%33.90%1.21%5.67%-12.59%3.76%18.26%
EMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
24.76%29.40%8.03%6.63%-18.99%4.45%15.32%

Correlation

The correlation between EMIF and EMXF is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.58

The correlation between EMIF and EMXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMIF vs. EMXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMIF
EMXF

Industrials

41.1%
5.5%

Utilities

40.1%
0.6%

Energy

18.8%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

2.6%

Communication Services

-

8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.9%

Financial Services

-

32.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Technology

-

35.2%

Industrials

EMIF
41.1%
EMXF
5.5%

Utilities

EMIF
40.1%
EMXF
0.6%

Energy

EMIF
18.8%
EMXF
0.0%

Basic Materials

EMIF

-

EMXF
2.6%

Communication Services

EMIF

-

EMXF
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EMIF

-

EMXF
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

EMIF

-

EMXF
2.9%

Financial Services

EMIF

-

EMXF
32.2%

Healthcare

EMIF

-

EMXF
4.2%

Real Estate

EMIF

-

EMXF
1.7%

Technology

EMIF

-

EMXF
35.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMIF vs. EMXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMIF
EMIF Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
EMIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMIF Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
EMIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMIF Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXF
EMXF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
EMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMIF vs. EMXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMIFEMXFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

2.55

-1.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

3.42

-1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.47

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

3.79

-2.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.92

14.56

-9.63

EMIF vs. EMXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMIF Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the EMXF Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMIF and EMXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMIFEMXFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.55

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.32

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.51

-0.34

Drawdowns

EMIF vs. EMXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMIF drawdown since its inception was -48.02%, which is greater than EMXF's maximum drawdown of -33.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIF and EMXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMIFEMXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.02%

-33.13%

-14.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.45%

-12.53%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

-15.93%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.68%

-32.89%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.45%

-1.30%

-11.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.91%

-12.02%

-3.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.31%

3.25%

+1.06%

Volatility

EMIF vs. EMXF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) is 4.38%, while iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that EMIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMIFEMXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

8.10%

-3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.97%

16.13%

-3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.41%

18.60%

-3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.67%

22.15%

-2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.61%

21.77%

-1.16%

EMIF vs. EMXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMIF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXF's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMIF vs. EMXF - Dividend Comparison

EMIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than EMXF's 2.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMIF
iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF
4.87%4.96%4.12%2.64%3.08%3.94%2.54%2.07%2.64%2.58%3.16%2.07%
EMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
2.75%3.43%2.92%2.25%2.42%1.87%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMIF and EMXF have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMXF has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to EMIF (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMIF dropped -48.02% vs EMXF's -33.13%.

On 5-year performance, EMXF leads with 7.15% vs 4.93% for EMIF. On fees, EMXF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, EMIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EMXF has performed better with a 7.15% return vs 4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMXF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMIF.

EMIF has the higher dividend yield at 4.87%, compared with 2.75% for EMXF.

EMIF tracks S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index, while EMXF tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Choice ESG Screened 5% Issuer Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMIF and 0.16% for EMXF.

EMXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMIF and EMXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer