EMHY vs. NEMD
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) and Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD).
EMHY and NEMD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMHY is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets High Yield Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2012. NEMD is an actively managed fund by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Sep 27, 2013.
Performance
EMHY vs. NEMD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMHY vs. NEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMHY iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF | -1.07% | 5.40% |
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF | -0.02% | 7.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMHY achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than NEMD's -0.02% return.
EMHY
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -1.07%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 10.13%
- 3Y*
- 11.28%
- 5Y*
- 4.20%
- 10Y*
- 4.63%
NEMD
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 3.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMHY vs. NEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMHY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NEMD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMHY vs. NEMD — Risk / Return Rank
EMHY
NEMD
EMHY vs. NEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) and Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMHY | NEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.21 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMHY | NEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 1.79 | -1.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMHY and NEMD is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EMHY vs. NEMD - Dividend Comparison
EMHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than NEMD's 3.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMHY iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF | 6.56% | 6.52% | 6.86% | 6.73% | 7.08% | 5.58% | 5.44% | 5.72% | 6.79% | 5.59% | 6.43% | 6.99% |
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF | 3.87% | 2.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EMHY vs. NEMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMHY drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, which is greater than NEMD's maximum drawdown of -4.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMHY and NEMD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMHY | NEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.11% | -4.43% | -25.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.00% | -3.03% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.95% | -0.51% | -4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | — | — |
Volatility
EMHY vs. NEMD - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMHY | NEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.51% | 6.30% | +1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.07% | 6.30% | +2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.65% | 6.30% | +4.35% |