NEMD vs. XEMD
NEMD (Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF) and XEMD (BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. NEMD is actively managed, while XEMD is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NEMD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for XEMD.
Performance
NEMD vs. XEMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEMD achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly higher than XEMD's 3.04% return.
NEMD
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 3.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XEMD
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 3.04%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 11.70%
- 3Y*
- 11.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEMD vs. XEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF | 3.51% | 7.10% |
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 3.04% | 5.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between NEMD and XEMD is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEMD vs. XEMD — Risk / Return Rank
NEMD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XEMD
NEMD vs. XEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NEMD | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.34 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.92 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NEMD vs. XEMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEMD drawdown since its inception was -4.43%, smaller than the maximum XEMD drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEMD and XEMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEMD | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -10.01% | +5.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -0.42% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.56% | -1.25% | +0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.79% | — |
Volatility
NEMD vs. XEMD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NEMD | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.65% | 4.80% | +1.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.65% | 6.88% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.65% | 6.88% | -0.23% |
NEMD vs. XEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NEMD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XEMD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
NEMD vs. XEMD - Dividend Comparison
NEMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, less than XEMD's 5.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEMD Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF | 4.74% | 2.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 5.81% | 6.15% | 6.30% | 6.19% | 3.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NEMD and XEMD have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEMD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEMD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NEMD.
XEMD has the higher dividend yield at 5.81%, compared with 4.74% for NEMD.
They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for NEMD and 0.29% for XEMD.
Find the right allocation for NEMD and XEMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer