PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMHY vs. EMCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMHY vs. EMCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMHY achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly higher than EMCB's 2.03% return. Over the past 10 years, EMHY has outperformed EMCB with an annualized return of 4.73%, while EMCB has yielded a comparatively lower 4.20% annualized return.


EMHY

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.38%
YTD
2.80%
6M
3.49%
1Y
12.96%
3Y*
13.15%
5Y*
4.25%
10Y*
4.73%

EMCB

1D
0.09%
1M
0.53%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.01%
1Y
7.19%
3Y*
7.97%
5Y*
2.17%
10Y*
4.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMHY vs. EMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMHY
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF
2.80%13.70%11.97%11.47%-13.03%-1.91%3.83%12.98%-5.21%8.54%
EMCB
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
2.03%8.19%7.11%8.76%-12.98%-0.62%8.60%13.43%-3.07%9.47%

Correlation

The correlation between EMHY and EMCB is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2012

0.39

The correlation between EMHY and EMCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EMHY vs. EMCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMHY
EMCB

Industrials

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

EMHY
100.0%
EMCB

-

Basic Materials

EMHY

-

EMCB

-

Communication Services

EMHY

-

EMCB

-

Consumer Cyclical

EMHY

-

EMCB

-

Consumer Defensive

EMHY

-

EMCB

-

Energy

EMHY

-

EMCB
100.0%

Financial Services

EMHY

-

EMCB

-

Healthcare

EMHY

-

EMCB

-

Real Estate

EMHY

-

EMCB

-

Technology

EMHY

-

EMCB

-

Utilities

EMHY

-

EMCB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMHY vs. EMCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMHY
EMHY Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EMHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EMHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

EMCB
EMCB Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EMCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCB Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMHY vs. EMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMHYEMCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.35

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.36

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.63

8.34

+5.28

EMHY vs. EMCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMHY Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the EMCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMHY and EMCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMHYEMCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.75

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.31

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.50

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.46

+0.04

Drawdowns

EMHY vs. EMCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMHY drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, which is greater than EMCB's maximum drawdown of -22.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMHY and EMCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMHYEMCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.11%

-22.81%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.34%

-3.07%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.95%

-4.20%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.83%

-21.50%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.11%

-22.81%

-7.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.64%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-4.23%

-0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

0.86%

+0.09%

Volatility

EMHY vs. EMCB - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) has a higher volatility of 1.66% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB) at 1.55%. This indicates that EMHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMHYEMCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.55%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.31%

2.89%

+1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.65%

4.16%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.10%

6.94%

+2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.66%

8.48%

+2.18%

EMHY vs. EMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMHY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCB's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMHY vs. EMCB - Dividend Comparison

EMHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, more than EMCB's 5.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMCB
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
5.35%5.47%5.29%5.09%4.04%3.43%3.85%4.17%4.20%4.04%4.08%5.09%
EMHY
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF
6.41%6.52%6.86%6.73%7.08%5.58%5.44%5.72%6.79%5.59%6.43%6.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMHY and EMCB have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMHY has higher volatility (1.66%) compared to EMCB (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMHY dropped -30.11% vs EMCB's -22.81%.

On 10-year performance, EMHY leads with 4.73% vs 4.20% for EMCB. On fees, EMHY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EMCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EMHY has performed better with a 4.73% return vs 4.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMHY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EMCB.

EMHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.41%, compared with 5.35% for EMCB.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EMHY and 0.60% for EMCB.

EMHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMHY and EMCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer