EMCB vs. EMTL
EMCB (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund) and EMTL (SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMCB returned 4.20%/yr vs 3.38%/yr for EMTL. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMCB charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for EMTL.
Performance
EMCB vs. EMTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMCB achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly higher than EMTL's 0.74% return. Over the past 10 years, EMCB has outperformed EMTL with an annualized return of 4.20%, while EMTL has yielded a comparatively lower 3.38% annualized return.
EMCB
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 7.19%
- 3Y*
- 7.97%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 4.20%
EMTL
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 5.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.09%
- 5Y*
- 1.79%
- 10Y*
- 3.38%
EMCB vs. EMTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCB WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | 2.03% | 8.19% | 7.11% | 8.76% | -12.98% | -0.62% | 8.60% | 13.43% | -3.07% | 9.47% |
EMTL SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF | 0.74% | 8.27% | 5.86% | 9.60% | -14.31% | 0.56% | 3.48% | 11.99% | -2.37% | 7.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMCB and EMTL is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2016 | 0.30 |
The correlation between EMCB and EMTL shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMCB vs. EMTL — Risk / Return Rank
EMCB
EMTL
EMCB vs. EMTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB) and SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMCB | EMTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.51 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 2.82 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.34 | 10.06 | -1.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMCB | EMTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 2.54 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.37 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.73 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.74 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
EMCB vs. EMTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMCB drawdown since its inception was -22.81%, roughly equal to the maximum EMTL drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCB and EMTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMCB | EMTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.81% | -22.91% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.07% | -2.00% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.20% | -3.79% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.50% | -22.91% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.81% | -22.91% | +0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -0.09% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.23% | -3.83% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 0.56% | +0.30% |
Volatility
EMCB vs. EMTL - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) at 0.67%. This indicates that EMCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMCB | EMTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.55% | 0.67% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | 1.65% | +1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.16% | 2.22% | +1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.94% | 4.88% | +2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.48% | 4.67% | +3.81% |
EMCB vs. EMTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMCB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than EMTL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMCB vs. EMTL - Dividend Comparison
EMCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, more than EMTL's 4.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCB WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | 5.35% | 5.47% | 5.29% | 5.09% | 4.04% | 3.43% | 3.85% | 4.17% | 4.20% | 4.04% | 4.08% | 5.09% |
EMTL SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF | 4.95% | 5.09% | 5.34% | 4.78% | 4.19% | 5.43% | 3.28% | 3.96% | 3.35% | 4.16% | 8.87% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMCB and EMTL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMCB has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to EMTL (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMCB dropped -22.81% vs EMTL's -22.91%.
On 10-year performance, EMCB leads with 4.20% vs 3.38% for EMTL. On fees, EMCB is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, EMTL has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EMCB has performed better with a 4.20% return vs 3.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMCB is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EMTL.
EMCB has the higher dividend yield at 5.35%, compared with 4.95% for EMTL.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EMCB and 0.65% for EMTL.
EMTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMCB and EMTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer