EMGF vs. UGA
EMGF (iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - EMGF is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMGF returned 11.25%/yr vs 14.31%/yr for UGA. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMGF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
EMGF vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMGF achieves a 25.77% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return. Over the past 10 years, EMGF has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of 11.25%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.31% annualized return.
EMGF
- 1D
- -5.41%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 25.77%
- 6M
- 26.91%
- 1Y
- 46.43%
- 3Y*
- 25.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
UGA
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- 64.09%
- 6M
- 60.42%
- 1Y
- 59.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 22.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
EMGF vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMGF iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 25.77% | 31.41% | 9.06% | 10.86% | -16.55% | 6.65% | 10.27% | 20.96% | -19.71% | 42.37% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 64.09% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMGF and UGA is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2015 | 0.18 |
The correlation between EMGF and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.18 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMGF vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
EMGF
UGA
EMGF vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMGF | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.30 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | 3.17 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.68 | 9.39 | +3.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMGF vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMGF drawdown since its inception was -40.23%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMGF and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMGF | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.23% | -86.59% | +46.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -18.96% | +5.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.65% | -26.68% | +9.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.20% | -38.11% | +9.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.23% | -75.89% | +35.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.41% | -18.05% | +12.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.02% | -36.69% | +26.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 6.43% | -2.76% |
Volatility
EMGF vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) has a higher volatility of 12.64% compared to United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) at 9.24%. This indicates that EMGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMGF | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.64% | 9.24% | +3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.71% | 30.57% | -9.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.67% | 35.22% | -12.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 34.45% | -16.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 37.22% | -17.55% |
EMGF vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMGF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMGF vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
EMGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMGF iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 2.00% | 2.52% | 3.42% | 5.94% | 4.04% | 2.48% | 1.95% | 2.63% | 2.73% | 1.94% | 2.04% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMGF and UGA have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMGF has higher volatility (12.64%) compared to UGA (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMGF dropped -40.23% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 14.31% vs 11.25% for EMGF. On fees, EMGF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, UGA has been the lower-risk option at 9.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 14.31% return vs 11.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMGF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
EMGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
EMGF is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. EMGF tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EMGF and 0.75% for UGA.
EMGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMGF and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer