EMGF vs. QEMM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMGF (iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) and QEMM (SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMGF tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index while QEMM tracks the MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMGF returned 11.48%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for QEMM. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMGF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for QEMM.

Performance

EMGF vs. QEMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMGF achieves a 30.01% return, which is significantly higher than QEMM's 24.39% return. Over the past 10 years, EMGF has outperformed QEMM with an annualized return of 11.48%, while QEMM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.96% annualized return.

EMGF

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: 9.65%
• YTD: 30.01%
• 6M: 32.52%
• 1Y: 55.31%
• 3Y*: 26.88%
• 5Y*: 10.38%
• 10Y*: 11.48%

QEMM

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: 6.69%
• YTD: 24.39%
• 6M: 26.00%
• 1Y: 42.27%
• 3Y*: 19.52%
• 5Y*: 7.37%
• 10Y*: 8.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMGF vs. QEMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMGF iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF	30.01%	31.41%	9.06%	10.86%	-16.55%	6.65%	10.27%	20.96%	-19.71%	42.37%
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF	24.39%	21.92%	4.98%	12.50%	-17.82%	6.34%	9.95%	15.40%	-13.33%	31.50%

Correlation

The correlation between EMGF and QEMM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2015	0.86

The correlation between EMGF and QEMM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMGF vs. QEMM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMGF	QEMM
Technology	34.7%	33.8%
Financial Services	19.2%	19.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	8.3%
Industrials	7.8%	7.2%
Communication Services	7.4%	6.4%
Basic Materials	5.8%	5.6%
Energy	4.3%	5.7%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	6.1%
Healthcare	2.9%	3.5%
Utilities	2.5%	3.0%
Real Estate	1.1%	0.8%

Return for Risk

EMGF vs. QEMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMGF

EMGF Risk / Return Rank: 81
EMGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
EMGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
EMGF Omega Ratio Rank: 83
EMGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
EMGF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

QEMM

QEMM Risk / Return Rank: 78
QEMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
QEMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QEMM Omega Ratio Rank: 79
QEMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
QEMM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMGF vs. QEMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMGF	QEMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.78	2.54	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.62	3.41	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.48	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.11	4.08	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.84	14.92	+0.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMGF vs. QEMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMGF Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the QEMM Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMGF and QEMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMGF	QEMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.78	2.54	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.49	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.53	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.34	+0.23

Drawdowns

EMGF vs. QEMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMGF drawdown since its inception was -40.23%, which is greater than QEMM's maximum drawdown of -36.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMGF and QEMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMGF	QEMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.23%	-36.89%	-3.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.54%	-10.40%	-3.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.65%	-17.03%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.60%	-27.49%	-1.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.23%	-36.89%	-3.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.20%	-1.21%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.05%	-10.64%	+0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	2.84%	+0.66%

Volatility

EMGF vs. QEMM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) has a higher volatility of 9.20% compared to SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) at 7.29%. This indicates that EMGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QEMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMGF	QEMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.20%	7.29%	+1.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.50%	14.78%	+2.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.99%	16.69%	+3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.69%	15.23%	+2.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.48%	16.89%	+2.59%

EMGF vs. QEMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMGF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QEMM's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMGF vs. QEMM - Dividend Comparison

EMGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than QEMM's 4.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMGF iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF	1.94%	2.52%	3.42%	5.94%	4.04%	2.48%	1.95%	2.63%	2.73%	1.94%	2.04%	0.00%
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF	4.34%	4.90%	5.17%	4.88%	4.07%	2.35%	2.48%	3.05%	2.86%	2.11%	2.03%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMGF and QEMM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, EMGF and QEMM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EMGF or QEMM?

EMGF has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to QEMM (7.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMGF dropped -40.23% vs QEMM's -36.89%.

Which ETF is better, EMGF or QEMM?

On 10-year performance, EMGF leads with 11.48% vs 8.96% for QEMM. On fees, QEMM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, QEMM has been the lower-risk option at 7.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMGF or QEMM?

Over the 10-year period, EMGF has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 8.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMGF or QEMM?

QEMM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EMGF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMGF or QEMM?

QEMM has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 1.94% for EMGF.

What is the main difference between EMGF and QEMM?

EMGF tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index, while QEMM tracks MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series (USD). They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EMGF and 0.30% for QEMM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.