PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMET vs. SMHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMET vs. SMHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) and VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMET vs. SMHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EMET
VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF
11.18%81.22%-7.55%
SMHX
VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF
-0.32%30.00%17.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMET achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly higher than SMHX's -0.32% return.


EMET

1D
2.40%
1M
-13.41%
YTD
11.18%
6M
31.79%
1Y
100.94%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
10Y*

SMHX

1D
1.86%
1M
-2.70%
YTD
-0.32%
6M
-1.36%
1Y
60.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMET vs. SMHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMET has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SMHX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EMET vs. SMHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMET
EMET Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EMET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMET Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMET Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EMET Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMET Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SMHX
SMHX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMET vs. SMHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) and VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMETSMHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.68

1.55

+1.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.03

2.19

+0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.30

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

3.56

+0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.07

9.59

+5.48

EMET vs. SMHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMET Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the SMHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMET and SMHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMETSMHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

1.55

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.77

-0.60

Correlation

The correlation between EMET and SMHX is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EMET vs. SMHX - Dividend Comparison

EMET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than SMHX's 0.02% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
EMET
VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF
1.66%1.84%1.89%2.02%2.56%
SMHX
VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF
0.02%0.02%0.04%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EMET vs. SMHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMET drawdown since its inception was -53.05%, which is greater than SMHX's maximum drawdown of -38.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMET and SMHX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMETSMHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.05%

-38.53%

-14.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.58%

-17.51%

-8.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.74%

-10.19%

-5.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.44%

-7.94%

-17.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.69%

6.50%

+0.19%

Volatility

EMET vs. SMHX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) has a higher volatility of 14.72% compared to VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) at 11.28%. This indicates that EMET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMETSMHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.72%

11.28%

+3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.86%

24.45%

+5.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.91%

39.40%

-1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.69%

39.80%

-7.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.69%

39.80%

-7.11%