EMDV vs. EDOG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG).

EMDV and EDOG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index. It was launched on Jan 25, 2016. EDOG is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the S-Network Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs Index. It was launched on Mar 28, 2014. Both EMDV and EDOG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

EMDV vs. EDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EMDV vs. EDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	-1.51%	11.90%	0.06%	-1.03%	-18.19%	1.11%	-0.09%	14.93%	-7.52%	26.98%
EDOG ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF	6.22%	22.59%	1.70%	11.58%	-10.50%	11.71%	7.99%	13.26%	-16.52%	20.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDV achieves a -1.51% return, which is significantly lower than EDOG's 6.22% return. Over the past 10 years, EMDV has underperformed EDOG with an annualized return of 2.24%, while EDOG has yielded a comparatively higher 6.00% annualized return.

EMDV

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -1.99%
• YTD: -1.51%
• 6M: 2.47%
• 1Y: 8.67%
• 3Y*: 1.57%
• 5Y*: -2.81%
• 10Y*: 2.24%

EDOG

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -3.21%
• YTD: 6.22%
• 6M: 11.98%
• 1Y: 26.06%
• 3Y*: 11.95%
• 5Y*: 7.40%
• 10Y*: 6.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMDV vs. EDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EMDV and EDOG have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

EMDV

ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF

EDOG

ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF

Return for Risk

EMDV vs. EDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMDV

EMDV Risk / Return Rank: 37
EMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
EMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
EMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 34
EMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
EMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 39

EDOG

EDOG Risk / Return Rank: 79
EDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
EDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
EDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 79
EDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
EDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMDV vs. EDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMDV	EDOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	1.45	-0.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	2.03	-0.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.32	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	2.55	-1.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.94	10.28	-6.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMDV vs. EDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the EDOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMDV and EDOG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMDV	EDOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73	1.45	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.18	0.49	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12	0.34	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.26	-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between EMDV and EDOG is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EMDV vs. EDOG - Dividend Comparison

EMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than EDOG's 4.70% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	2.47%	2.46%	2.79%	1.88%	3.68%	2.12%	3.12%	2.38%	1.27%	2.09%	2.87%	0.00%
EDOG ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF	4.70%	4.50%	6.55%	6.53%	5.07%	4.11%	2.60%	4.93%	5.37%	2.89%	2.97%	4.55%

Drawdowns

EMDV vs. EDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDV drawdown since its inception was -39.20%, smaller than the maximum EDOG drawdown of -44.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDV and EDOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMDV	EDOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.20%	-44.29%	+5.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.48%	-10.35%	+2.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.97%	-26.54%	-8.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.20%	-44.29%	+5.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.05%	-5.47%	-11.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.53%	-11.29%	-2.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	2.60%	-0.34%

Volatility

EMDV vs. EDOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) is 4.86%, while ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that EMDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMDV	EDOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.86%	6.52%	-1.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.30%	13.14%	-4.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.95%	18.05%	-6.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.40%	15.29%	+0.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.28%	17.72%	+0.56%