EMDV vs. BNDX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX).
EMDV and BNDX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index. It was launched on Jan 25, 2016. BNDX is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Float-Adjusted Index (Hedged). It was launched on May 31, 2013. Both EMDV and BNDX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMDV or BNDX.
Correlation
The correlation between EMDV and BNDX is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
EMDV vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EMDV:
0.07
BNDX:
1.40
EMDV:
0.20
BNDX:
1.97
EMDV:
1.03
BNDX:
1.24
EMDV:
0.03
BNDX:
0.57
EMDV:
0.08
BNDX:
6.11
EMDV:
11.28%
BNDX:
0.83%
EMDV:
17.69%
BNDX:
3.73%
EMDV:
-39.19%
BNDX:
-16.23%
EMDV:
-22.37%
BNDX:
-3.01%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMDV achieves a 3.16% return, which is significantly higher than BNDX's 1.10% return.
EMDV
3.16%
5.62%
-2.19%
1.28%
2.50%
N/A
BNDX
1.10%
1.05%
1.65%
5.21%
0.06%
2.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMDV vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMDV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMDV vs. BNDX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EMDV
BNDX
EMDV vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EMDV vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison
EMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than BNDX's 4.29% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF | 2.78% | 2.79% | 1.88% | 3.68% | 2.12% | 3.12% | 2.38% | 1.27% | 2.09% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 4.29% | 4.18% | 4.42% | 1.52% | 3.74% | 1.11% | 3.40% | 3.01% | 2.23% | 1.89% | 1.63% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
EMDV vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMDV drawdown since its inception was -39.19%, which is greater than BNDX's maximum drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDV and BNDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EMDV vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) at 1.08%. This indicates that EMDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.