BDVG vs. SCHX
BDVG (iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDVG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by iMGP, while SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. BDVG is actively managed, while SCHX is passively managed. Over the past year, BDVG returned 24.96% vs 29.14% for SCHX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BDVG charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
BDVG vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDVG achieves a 13.16% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 11.50% return.
BDVG
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 6.53%
- YTD
- 13.16%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 24.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 11.50%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 29.14%
- 3Y*
- 22.67%
- 5Y*
- 13.65%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
BDVG vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BDVG iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF | 13.16% | 13.81% | 11.75% | 3.25% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 11.50% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 8.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDVG and SCHX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2023 | 0.68 |
The correlation between BDVG and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
BDVG vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BDVG
SCHX
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Communication Services
Industrials
BDVG
SCHX
Technology
BDVG
SCHX
Financial Services
BDVG
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
BDVG
SCHX
Energy
BDVG
SCHX
Healthcare
BDVG
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
BDVG
SCHX
Basic Materials
BDVG
SCHX
Utilities
BDVG
SCHX
Real Estate
BDVG
SCHX
Communication Services
BDVG
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDVG vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
BDVG
SCHX
BDVG vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDVG | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.52 | 2.45 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.64 | 3.32 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.44 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | 3.31 | +0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.77 | 15.11 | -0.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDVG | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 2.45 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.22 | 0.85 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
BDVG vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDVG drawdown since its inception was -14.46%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDVG and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDVG | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.46% | -34.33% | +19.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.70% | -9.02% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.35% | -3.97% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 1.98% | -0.24% |
Volatility
BDVG vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 2.81%. This indicates that BDVG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDVG | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 2.81% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.52% | 9.00% | -1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.96% | 11.97% | -2.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.96% | 17.12% | -5.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.96% | 18.15% | -6.19% |
BDVG vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDVG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDVG vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
BDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than SCHX's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDVG iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF | 1.51% | 1.75% | 1.69% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDVG and SCHX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDVG has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to SCHX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDVG dropped -14.46% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 1-year performance, SCHX leads with 29.14% vs 24.96% for BDVG. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 29.14% return vs 24.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BDVG.
BDVG has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 1.00% for SCHX.
BDVG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: iMGP and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for BDVG and 0.03% for SCHX.
BDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDVG and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer