PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDVG vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDVG vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDVG achieves a 13.16% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 11.50% return.


BDVG

1D
0.55%
1M
6.53%
YTD
13.16%
6M
13.91%
1Y
24.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHX

1D
0.20%
1M
5.43%
YTD
11.50%
6M
11.84%
1Y
29.14%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
13.65%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDVG vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BDVG
iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF
13.16%13.81%11.75%3.25%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
11.50%17.46%24.88%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between BDVG and SCHX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2023

0.68

The correlation between BDVG and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

BDVG vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BDVG
SCHX

Industrials

18.6%
8.5%

Technology

18.2%
37.5%

Financial Services

17.0%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

11.6%
4.5%

Energy

10.5%
3.4%

Healthcare

9.8%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
9.7%

Basic Materials

3.7%
1.8%

Utilities

3.1%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.3%
2.0%

Communication Services

0.6%
10.3%

Industrials

BDVG
18.6%
SCHX
8.5%

Technology

BDVG
18.2%
SCHX
37.5%

Financial Services

BDVG
17.0%
SCHX
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

BDVG
11.6%
SCHX
4.5%

Energy

BDVG
10.5%
SCHX
3.4%

Healthcare

BDVG
9.8%
SCHX
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BDVG
6.2%
SCHX
9.7%

Basic Materials

BDVG
3.7%
SCHX
1.8%

Utilities

BDVG
3.1%
SCHX
2.6%

Real Estate

BDVG
1.3%
SCHX
2.0%

Communication Services

BDVG
0.6%
SCHX
10.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDVG vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDVG
BDVG Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDVG vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDVGSCHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

2.45

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.64

3.32

+0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.44

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

3.31

+0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.77

15.11

-0.33

BDVG vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDVG Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDVG and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDVGSCHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.45

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.22

0.85

+0.37

Drawdowns

BDVG vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDVG drawdown since its inception was -14.46%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDVG and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDVGSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.46%

-34.33%

+19.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.70%

-9.02%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.35%

-3.97%

+1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

1.98%

-0.24%

Volatility

BDVG vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 2.81%. This indicates that BDVG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDVGSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

2.81%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.52%

9.00%

-1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.96%

11.97%

-2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.96%

17.12%

-5.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.96%

18.15%

-6.19%

BDVG vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDVG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BDVG vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

BDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than SCHX's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDVG
iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF
1.51%1.75%1.69%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.00%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


BDVG and SCHX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDVG has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to SCHX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDVG dropped -14.46% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

On 1-year performance, SCHX leads with 29.14% vs 24.96% for BDVG. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 29.14% return vs 24.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BDVG.

BDVG has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 1.00% for SCHX.

BDVG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: iMGP and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for BDVG and 0.03% for SCHX.

BDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDVG and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer