EMDM vs. DEM
EMDM (First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF) and DEM (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EMDM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net, while DEM is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMDM returned 28.08%/yr vs 17.15%/yr for DEM. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EMDM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for DEM.
Performance
EMDM vs. DEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMDM achieves a 28.39% return, which is significantly higher than DEM's 17.69% return.
EMDM
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- 6M
- 12.42%
- YTD
- 28.39%
- 1Y
- 66.69%
- 3Y*
- 28.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.54%
DEM
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- YTD
- 17.69%
- 1Y
- 25.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.16M | $9.32M | $10.88M | |
| $370.33K | $752.09K | $541.22K |
EMDM vs. DEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF | 28.39% | 59.68% | -4.93% | 14.75% |
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 17.69% | 21.29% | 4.46% | 13.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMDM and DEM is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between EMDM and DEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMDM vs. DEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMDM
DEM
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Technology
EMDM
DEM
Financial Services
EMDM
DEM
Basic Materials
EMDM
DEM
Consumer Cyclical
EMDM
DEM
Energy
EMDM
DEM
Communication Services
EMDM
DEM
Consumer Defensive
EMDM
DEM
Industrials
EMDM
DEM
Utilities
EMDM
DEM
Healthcare
EMDM
DEM
Real Estate
EMDM
-
DEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMDM vs. DEM — Risk / Return Rank
EMDM
DEM
EMDM vs. DEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMDM | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.31 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.28 | 3.23 | +1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.58 | 9.72 | +3.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMDM vs. DEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMDM drawdown since its inception was -18.81%, smaller than the maximum DEM drawdown of -51.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDM and DEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMDM | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.81% | -51.85% | +33.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.65% | -7.89% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.81% | -15.64% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.51% | -3.06% | -7.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -12.82% | +8.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | 2.62% | +2.31% |
Volatility
EMDM vs. DEM - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) has a higher volatility of 9.92% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) at 5.13%. This indicates that EMDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMDM | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.92% | 5.13% | +4.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.36% | 13.19% | +12.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.91% | 15.02% | +12.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.15% | 15.61% | +5.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.15% | 17.86% | +3.29% |
EMDM vs. DEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMDM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DEM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMDM vs. DEM - Dividend Comparison
EMDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, less than DEM's 4.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 4.16% | 4.88% | 5.24% | 5.49% | 8.62% | 5.87% | 4.21% | 4.78% | 4.47% | 3.67% | 3.63% | 5.21% |
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF | 2.95% | 3.57% | 5.87% | 2.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMDM and DEM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMDM has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to DEM (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMDM dropped -18.81% vs DEM's -51.85%.
On 3-year performance, EMDM leads with 28.08% vs 17.15% for DEM. On fees, DEM is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, DEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EMDM has performed better with a 28.08% return vs 17.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DEM is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMDM.
DEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 2.95% for EMDM.
EMDM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DEM is Dividend. EMDM tracks Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net, while DEM tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMDM and 0.63% for DEM.
EMDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMDM and DEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer