PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMCB vs. EMHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMCB vs. EMHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMCB achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly lower than EMHY's 2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, EMCB has underperformed EMHY with an annualized return of 3.83%, while EMHY has yielded a comparatively higher 4.28% annualized return.


EMCB

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.32%
6M
0.75%
YTD
1.84%
1Y
4.81%
3Y*
7.22%
5Y*
2.03%
10Y*
3.83%
ALL TIME*
3.68%

EMHY

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.79%
6M
1.95%
YTD
2.96%
1Y
9.70%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
4.38%
10Y*
4.28%
ALL TIME*
4.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$161.65K$154.71K$333.62K
$3.06M$3.58M$3.53M

EMCB vs. EMHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMCB
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
1.84%8.19%7.11%8.76%-12.98%-0.62%8.60%13.43%-3.07%9.47%
EMHY
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF
2.96%13.70%11.97%11.47%-13.03%-1.91%3.83%12.98%-5.21%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between EMCB and EMHY is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2012

0.39

The correlation between EMCB and EMHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMCB vs. EMHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMCB
EMCB Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EMCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCB Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

EMHY
EMHY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EMHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EMHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMCB vs. EMHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMCBEMHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.33

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

2.21

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.45

9.86

-4.41

EMCB vs. EMHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the EMHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMCB and EMHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMCB vs. EMHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMCB drawdown since its inception was -22.81%, smaller than the maximum EMHY drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCB and EMHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMCBEMHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.81%

-30.11%

+7.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-4.34%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.20%

-5.95%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.50%

-25.83%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.81%

-30.11%

+7.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-0.86%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-4.84%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.97%

-0.08%

Volatility

EMCB vs. EMHY - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) have volatilities of 1.10% and 1.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMCBEMHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

1.14%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.03%

4.48%

-1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

5.70%

-2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.92%

9.10%

-2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.43%

10.65%

-2.22%

EMCB vs. EMHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMCB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EMHY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMCB vs. EMHY - Dividend Comparison

EMCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, less than EMHY's 6.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMCB
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
5.40%5.47%5.29%5.09%4.04%3.43%3.85%4.17%4.20%4.04%4.08%5.09%
EMHY
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF
5.94%6.52%6.86%6.73%7.08%5.58%5.44%5.72%6.79%5.59%6.43%6.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMCB and EMHY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMHY has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to EMCB (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMCB dropped -22.81% vs EMHY's -30.11%.

On 10-year performance, EMHY leads with 4.28% vs 3.83% for EMCB. On fees, EMHY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EMHY has performed better with a 4.28% return vs 3.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMHY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EMCB.

EMHY has the higher dividend yield at 5.94%, compared with 5.40% for EMCB.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EMCB and 0.50% for EMHY.

EMHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMCB and EMHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer