EMC vs. EMDV
EMC (Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF) and EMDV (ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. EMC is actively managed, while EMDV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMC returned 13.10%/yr vs 2.30%/yr for EMDV. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EMC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EMDV.
Performance
EMC vs. EMDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMC achieves a 17.02% return, which is significantly higher than EMDV's 2.19% return.
EMC
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- YTD
- 17.02%
- 1Y
- 25.57%
- 3Y*
- 13.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.64%
EMDV
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- 6.81%
- 3Y*
- 2.30%
- 5Y*
- -1.67%
- 10Y*
- 1.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $303.53K | $204.31K | $229.90K | |
| $3.02K | $6.25K | $10.42K |
EMC vs. EMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMC Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF | 17.02% | 18.91% | 3.75% | 1.62% |
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF | 2.19% | 11.90% | 0.06% | -3.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMC and EMDV is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2023 | 0.71 |
The correlation between EMC and EMDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMC vs. EMDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMC
EMDV
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
EMC
EMDV
Financial Services
EMC
EMDV
Consumer Cyclical
EMC
EMDV
Communication Services
EMC
EMDV
Industrials
EMC
EMDV
Basic Materials
EMC
EMDV
Energy
EMC
EMDV
-
Consumer Defensive
EMC
EMDV
Healthcare
EMC
EMDV
Real Estate
EMC
EMDV
-
Utilities
EMC
-
EMDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMC vs. EMDV — Risk / Return Rank
EMC
EMDV
EMC vs. EMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMC | EMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.11 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 0.94 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.44 | 2.24 | +3.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMC vs. EMDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMC drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum EMDV drawdown of -39.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMC and EMDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMC | EMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -39.20% | +20.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.89% | -7.24% | -6.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.38% | -20.71% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.19% | -13.94% | +5.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.23% | -13.59% | +9.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 3.04% | +1.67% |
Volatility
EMC vs. EMDV - Volatility Comparison
Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) has a higher volatility of 9.28% compared to ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) at 3.09%. This indicates that EMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMC | EMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.28% | 3.09% | +6.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.22% | 9.92% | +12.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.58% | 11.68% | +12.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.72% | 15.42% | +4.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.72% | 17.99% | +1.73% |
EMC vs. EMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EMDV's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMC vs. EMDV - Dividend Comparison
EMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than EMDV's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMC Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF | 0.58% | 0.78% | 1.13% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF | 1.89% | 2.46% | 2.79% | 1.88% | 3.68% | 2.12% | 3.12% | 2.38% | 1.27% | 2.09% | 2.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMC and EMDV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMC has higher volatility (9.28%) compared to EMDV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMC dropped -18.38% vs EMDV's -39.20%.
On 3-year performance, EMC leads with 13.10% vs 2.30% for EMDV. On fees, EMDV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, EMDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EMC has performed better with a 13.10% return vs 2.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMDV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMC.
EMDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.58% for EMC.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMC and 0.60% for EMDV.
EMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMC and EMDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer