EMBD vs. BEMB
EMBD (Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF) and BEMB (Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMBD returned 9.44%/yr vs 8.80%/yr for BEMB. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMBD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BEMB.
Performance
EMBD vs. BEMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with EMBD at 1.27% and BEMB at 1.27%.
EMBD
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 10.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.44%
- 5Y*
- 2.87%
- 10Y*
- —
BEMB
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 9.77%
- 3Y*
- 8.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMBD vs. BEMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMBD Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 1.27% | 12.55% | 6.76% | 9.16% |
BEMB Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 1.27% | 12.27% | 5.51% | 8.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMBD and BEMB is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2023 | 0.75 |
The correlation between EMBD and BEMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMBD vs. BEMB — Risk / Return Rank
EMBD
BEMB
EMBD vs. BEMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) and Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMBD | BEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.45 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 2.68 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.52 | 11.53 | -2.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMBD | BEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 2.30 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 1.45 | -1.00 |
Drawdowns
EMBD vs. BEMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMBD drawdown since its inception was -24.27%, which is greater than BEMB's maximum drawdown of -6.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMBD and BEMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMBD | BEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.27% | -6.17% | -18.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.23% | -3.67% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.03% | -6.17% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -0.34% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -0.94% | -4.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 0.85% | +0.24% |
Volatility
EMBD vs. BEMB - Volatility Comparison
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) has a higher volatility of 1.62% compared to Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) at 1.49%. This indicates that EMBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMBD | BEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.62% | 1.49% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.16% | 3.46% | +0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.00% | 4.26% | +1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.17% | 5.88% | +3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.89% | 5.88% | +3.01% |
EMBD vs. BEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMBD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BEMB's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMBD vs. BEMB - Dividend Comparison
EMBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, less than BEMB's 6.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEMB Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 6.88% | 6.88% | 6.31% | 5.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMBD Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.69% | 5.48% | 5.83% | 5.29% | 4.53% | 4.99% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMBD and BEMB have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMBD has higher volatility (1.62%) compared to BEMB (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMBD dropped -24.27% vs BEMB's -6.17%.
On 3-year performance, EMBD leads with 9.44% vs 8.80% for BEMB. On fees, BEMB is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BEMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EMBD has performed better with a 9.44% return vs 8.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BEMB is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EMBD.
BEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.88%, compared with 5.69% for EMBD.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EMBD and 0.18% for BEMB.
BEMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMBD and BEMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer