EMB vs. KHYB
EMB (iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF) and KHYB (KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - EMB tracks the JPMorgan EMBI Global Core Index while KHYB tracks the JP Morgan Asia Credit Index Non-Investment Grade Corporate Index.. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMB returned 1.86%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for KHYB. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KHYB.
Performance
EMB vs. KHYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMB achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than KHYB's 2.50% return.
EMB
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 11.56%
- 3Y*
- 9.74%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- 3.29%
KHYB
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 2.50%
- 6M
- 3.54%
- 1Y
- 10.54%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- —
EMB vs. KHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 1.80% | 13.85% | 5.54% | 10.62% | -18.63% | -2.23% | 5.42% | 15.48% | 1.07% |
KHYB KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF | 2.50% | 9.59% | 10.79% | 3.50% | -10.15% | -12.32% | 2.00% | 8.87% | 0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMB and KHYB is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2018 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, EMB and KHYB have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMB vs. KHYB — Risk / Return Rank
EMB
KHYB
EMB vs. KHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMB | KHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.71 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 2.67 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.01 | 11.98 | -0.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMB | KHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 3.11 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.03 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.28 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
EMB vs. KHYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMB drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, roughly equal to the maximum KHYB drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMB and KHYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMB | KHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.70% | -33.63% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.51% | -3.97% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.95% | -5.94% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.74% | -32.86% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.62% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -9.71% | +4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 0.88% | +0.17% |
Volatility
EMB vs. KHYB - Volatility Comparison
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) has a higher volatility of 1.85% compared to KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) at 0.90%. This indicates that EMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KHYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMB | KHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.85% | 0.90% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.52% | 3.02% | +1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.56% | 3.40% | +2.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.75% | 6.32% | +3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.96% | 5.71% | +4.25% |
EMB vs. KHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than KHYB's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMB vs. KHYB - Dividend Comparison
EMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, less than KHYB's 8.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.06% | 4.98% | 5.46% | 4.74% | 5.04% | 3.89% | 3.88% | 4.51% | 5.64% | 4.54% | 4.83% | 4.84% |
KHYB KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF | 8.13% | 7.59% | 10.11% | 15.55% | 9.67% | 6.22% | 4.76% | 4.86% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMB and KHYB have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMB has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to KHYB (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMB dropped -34.70% vs KHYB's -33.63%.
On 5-year performance, EMB leads with 1.86% vs 0.17% for KHYB. On fees, EMB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, KHYB has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMB has performed better with a 1.86% return vs 0.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KHYB.
KHYB has the higher dividend yield at 8.13%, compared with 5.06% for EMB.
EMB tracks JPMorgan EMBI Global Core Index, while KHYB tracks JP Morgan Asia Credit Index Non-Investment Grade Corporate Index.. They also come from different issuers: iShares and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EMB and 0.69% for KHYB.
KHYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMB and KHYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer