ELV vs. SLB
ELV (Elevance Health Inc) and SLB (Schlumberger Limited) are both stocks. ELV operates in Healthcare Plans (Healthcare), while SLB operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy). Over the past 10 years, ELV returned 13.53%/yr vs -0.34%/yr for SLB. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ELV vs. SLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ELV achieves a 16.45% return, which is significantly lower than SLB's 48.01% return. Over the past 10 years, ELV has outperformed SLB with an annualized return of 13.53%, while SLB has yielded a comparatively lower -0.34% annualized return.
ELV
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 13.69%
- 1Y
- 6.82%
- 3Y*
- -3.25%
- 5Y*
- 2.49%
- 10Y*
- 13.53%
SLB
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 48.01%
- 6M
- 44.00%
- 1Y
- 61.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- -0.34%
ELV vs. SLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELV Elevance Health Inc | 16.45% | -3.14% | -20.72% | -6.89% | 11.83% | 46.12% | 7.74% | 16.33% | 18.11% | 58.72% |
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 48.01% | 3.27% | -24.47% | -0.78% | 81.15% | 40.30% | -43.81% | 17.73% | -44.66% | -17.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between ELV and SLB is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2001 | 0.25 |
The correlation between ELV and SLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ELV:
$23.46
SLB:
$3.04
ELV:
17.22
SLB:
18.45
ELV:
0.45
SLB:
1.70
ELV:
$200.42B
SLB:
$35.94B
ELV:
$46.43B
SLB:
$4.90B
ELV:
$8.92B
SLB:
$5.30B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ELV vs. SLB — Risk / Return Rank
ELV
SLB
ELV vs. SLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Elevance Health Inc (ELV) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ELV | SLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.31 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 4.36 | -4.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.41 | 10.97 | -10.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ELV vs. SLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ELV drawdown since its inception was -67.19%, smaller than the maximum SLB drawdown of -87.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELV and SLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ELV | SLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.19% | -87.64% | +20.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.60% | -14.30% | -16.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.38% | -46.63% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.38% | -46.63% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.38% | -84.29% | +33.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.47% | -33.53% | +8.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.29% | -31.18% | +15.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.75% | 5.67% | +11.08% |
Volatility
ELV vs. SLB - Volatility Comparison
Elevance Health Inc (ELV) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB) have volatilities of 9.29% and 9.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ELV | SLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.29% | 9.50% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.54% | 25.72% | +1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.79% | 33.73% | +5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.00% | 37.63% | -8.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.86% | 40.41% | -9.55% |
Dividends
ELV vs. SLB - Dividend Comparison
ELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than SLB's 2.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELV Elevance Health Inc | 1.70% | 1.95% | 1.77% | 1.26% | 1.00% | 0.98% | 1.18% | 1.06% | 1.14% | 1.20% | 1.81% | 1.79% |
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 2.06% | 2.97% | 2.87% | 1.92% | 1.22% | 2.09% | 4.01% | 4.98% | 5.54% | 2.97% | 2.38% | 2.87% |
Financials
ELV vs. SLB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Elevance Health Inc and Schlumberger Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ELV vs. SLB - Profitability Comparison
ELV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elevance Health Inc reported a gross profit of 9.10B and revenue of 50.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.1%.
SLB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 8.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ELV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elevance Health Inc reported an operating income of 2.66B and revenue of 50.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.
SLB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 8.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
ELV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elevance Health Inc reported a net income of 1.76B and revenue of 50.18B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.
SLB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a net income of 752.00M and revenue of 8.72B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ELV and SLB have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLB has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to ELV (9.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELV dropped -67.19% vs SLB's -87.64%.
SLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ELV and SLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer