ELF.TO vs. CRE.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ELF.TO (E-L Financial Corporation Limited) and CRE.L (Conduit Holdings Ltd) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — ELF.TO in Insurance - Life, CRE.L in Insurance - Reinsurance. Over the past 5 years, ELF.TO returned 21.32%/yr vs 4.49%/yr for CRE.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ELF.TO vs. CRE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in E-L Financial Corporation Limited (ELF.TO) and Conduit Holdings Ltd (CRE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ELF.TO is traded in CAD, while CRE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CRE.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELF.TO achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly lower than CRE.L's 12.12% return.

ELF.TO

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -0.29%
• YTD: 10.77%
• 6M: 9.29%
• 1Y: 8.07%
• 3Y*: 34.50%
• 5Y*: 21.32%
• 10Y*: 14.40%

CRE.L

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -2.81%
• YTD: 12.12%
• 6M: 26.99%
• 1Y: 18.16%
• 3Y*: 5.07%
• 5Y*: 4.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELF.TO vs. CRE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ELF.TO E-L Financial Corporation Limited	10.77%	37.18%	35.10%	19.15%	2.24%	30.90%	8.82%
CRE.L Conduit Holdings Ltd	12.12%	-6.66%	12.50%	19.90%	2.24%	-13.99%	0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between ELF.TO and CRE.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020	0.10

Fundamentals

EPS ELF.TO : CA$3.36 CRE.L : £1.42
PE Ratio ELF.TO : 5.03 CRE.L : 2.98
PS Ratio ELF.TO : 2.70 CRE.L : 0.45
Total Revenue (TTM) ELF.TO : CA$2.22B CRE.L : £1.49B
Gross Profit (TTM) ELF.TO : CA$1.64B CRE.L : £1.49B
EBITDA (TTM) ELF.TO : CA$1.57B CRE.L : £320.30M

Return for Risk

ELF.TO vs. CRE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELF.TO

ELF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 52
ELF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ELF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ELF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 46
ELF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
ELF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 56

CRE.L

CRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
CRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
CRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 56
CRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
CRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELF.TO vs. CRE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-L Financial Corporation Limited (ELF.TO) and Conduit Holdings Ltd (CRE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ELF.TO	CRE.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	0.52	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.76	0.82	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.14	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	0.66	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.51	1.68	-0.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ELF.TO vs. CRE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is comparable to the CRE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELF.TO and CRE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ELF.TO	CRE.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40	0.52	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.18	0.16	+1.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.15	+0.43

Drawdowns

ELF.TO vs. CRE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELF.TO drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, which is greater than CRE.L's maximum drawdown of -47.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELF.TO and CRE.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ELF.TO	CRE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.46%	-47.72%	-14.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.89%	-27.61%	+15.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.88%	-43.54%	+23.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.88%	-46.74%	+26.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.47%	-10.89%	+6.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.40%	-16.46%	+0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.21%	10.81%	-4.60%

Volatility

ELF.TO vs. CRE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for E-L Financial Corporation Limited (ELF.TO) is 5.83%, while Conduit Holdings Ltd (CRE.L) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that ELF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ELF.TO	CRE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.83%	6.81%	-0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.49%	18.69%	-6.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.19%	34.97%	-13.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.45%	27.84%	-1.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.60%	27.01%	-2.41%

Dividends

ELF.TO vs. CRE.L - Dividend Comparison

ELF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, more than CRE.L's 6.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRE.L Conduit Holdings Ltd	6.15%	6.88%	5.85%	6.00%	6.26%	3.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ELF.TO E-L Financial Corporation Limited	7.16%	10.19%	5.66%	1.43%	3.91%	9.76%	3.92%	0.60%	0.68%	0.61%	0.68%	0.07%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ELF.TO and CRE.L in my portfolio?

ELF.TO and CRE.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.