PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ELF.TO vs. FFH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ELF.TO vs. FFH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in E-L Financial Corporation Limited (ELF.TO) and Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (FFH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELF.TO achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly higher than FFH.TO's -16.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ELF.TO having a 14.40% annualized return and FFH.TO not far ahead at 14.59%.


ELF.TO

1D
-0.94%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
10.77%
6M
9.29%
1Y
8.07%
3Y*
34.50%
5Y*
21.32%
10Y*
14.40%

FFH.TO

1D
0.16%
1M
-1.84%
YTD
-16.39%
6M
-7.73%
1Y
-5.14%
3Y*
31.57%
5Y*
32.54%
10Y*
14.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELF.TO vs. FFH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ELF.TO
E-L Financial Corporation Limited
10.77%37.18%35.10%19.15%2.24%30.90%-3.31%12.74%-8.60%12.14%
FFH.TO
Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited
-16.39%32.22%66.26%54.96%31.51%47.29%-27.31%3.63%-8.51%5.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ELF.TO and FFH.TO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 1980

0.03

The correlation between ELF.TO and FFH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ELF.TO:

CA$6.01B

FFH.TO:

CA$48.51B

EPS

ELF.TO:

CA$3.36

FFH.TO:

CA$205.21

PE Ratio

ELF.TO:

5.03

FFH.TO:

10.57

PEG Ratio

ELF.TO:

0.00

FFH.TO:

0.17

PS Ratio

ELF.TO:

2.70

FFH.TO:

1.63

PB Ratio

ELF.TO:

0.69

FFH.TO:

1.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

ELF.TO:

CA$2.22B

FFH.TO:

CA$29.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ELF.TO:

CA$1.64B

FFH.TO:

CA$6.18B

EBITDA (TTM)

ELF.TO:

CA$1.57B

FFH.TO:

CA$7.83B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ELF.TO vs. FFH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELF.TO
ELF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ELF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
ELF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FFH.TO
FFH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FFH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FFH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELF.TO vs. FFH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-L Financial Corporation Limited (ELF.TO) and Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (FFH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ELF.TOFFH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.98

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

-0.27

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.51

-0.63

+2.14

ELF.TO vs. FFH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the FFH.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELF.TO and FFH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ELF.TOFFH.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

-0.23

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.18

1.37

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.57

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.47

+0.11

Drawdowns

ELF.TO vs. FFH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELF.TO drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, smaller than the maximum FFH.TO drawdown of -88.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELF.TO and FFH.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ELF.TOFFH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.46%

-88.18%

+25.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.89%

-18.88%

+6.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.88%

-18.88%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.88%

-18.88%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.84%

-56.23%

+13.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.47%

-16.66%

+12.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.40%

-27.42%

+11.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.21%

8.13%

-1.92%

Volatility

ELF.TO vs. FFH.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for E-L Financial Corporation Limited (ELF.TO) is 5.83%, while Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (FFH.TO) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that ELF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ELF.TOFFH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.83%

6.57%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.49%

18.41%

-5.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.19%

22.61%

-1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.45%

24.00%

+2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.60%

25.57%

-0.97%

Dividends

ELF.TO vs. FFH.TO - Dividend Comparison

ELF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, more than FFH.TO's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ELF.TO
E-L Financial Corporation Limited
7.16%10.19%5.66%1.43%3.91%9.76%3.92%0.60%0.68%0.61%0.68%0.07%
FFH.TO
Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited
0.96%0.82%1.01%1.10%1.56%2.05%3.01%2.17%2.07%1.97%2.24%1.82%

Financials

ELF.TO vs. FFH.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between E-L Financial Corporation Limited and Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-2.00B0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
16.00M
6.41B
(ELF.TO) Total Revenue
(FFH.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ELF.TO and FFH.TO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ELF.TO and FFH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer