PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIX vs. QSR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EIX vs. QSR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Edison International (EIX) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIX achieves a 25.47% return, which is significantly higher than QSR's 7.43% return. Over the past 10 years, EIX has underperformed QSR with an annualized return of 4.40%, while QSR has yielded a comparatively higher 8.75% annualized return.


EIX

1D
2.12%
1M
6.35%
YTD
25.47%
6M
29.64%
1Y
44.50%
3Y*
8.42%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
4.40%

QSR

1D
1.16%
1M
-8.84%
YTD
7.43%
6M
0.56%
1Y
5.72%
3Y*
2.34%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*
8.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIX vs. QSR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIX
Edison International
25.47%-20.42%15.24%17.37%-2.58%13.59%-12.75%37.61%-6.65%-9.48%
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
7.43%8.64%-13.80%24.64%10.72%2.72%-0.34%25.61%-12.15%30.69%

Correlation

The correlation between EIX and QSR is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2014

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EIX:

$28.23B

QSR:

$33.35B

EPS

EIX:

$9.61

QSR:

$2.09

PE Ratio

EIX:

7.63

QSR:

34.81

PS Ratio

EIX:

1.44

QSR:

3.47

PB Ratio

EIX:

1.64

QSR:

8.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

EIX:

$19.61B

QSR:

$9.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EIX:

$4.27B

QSR:

$3.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

EIX:

$6.48B

QSR:

$2.49B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIX vs. QSR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIX
EIX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
EIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

QSR
QSR Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
QSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSR Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
QSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSR Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIX vs. QSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Edison International (EIX) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIXQSRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.06

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

0.42

+3.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.71

0.92

+9.79

EIX vs. QSR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the QSR Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIX and QSR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIXQSRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

0.24

+1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.20

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.32

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.34

-0.01

Drawdowns

EIX vs. QSR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIX drawdown since its inception was -72.18%, which is greater than QSR's maximum drawdown of -63.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIX and QSR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIXQSRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.18%

-63.03%

-9.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.39%

-13.29%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.88%

-24.53%

-19.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.88%

-29.27%

-14.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.88%

-63.03%

+19.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.78%

-11.03%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.02%

-12.05%

-2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

6.09%

-1.89%

Volatility

EIX vs. QSR - Volatility Comparison

Edison International (EIX) has a higher volatility of 6.88% compared to Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) at 5.97%. This indicates that EIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QSR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIXQSRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.88%

5.97%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.18%

17.18%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.80%

23.11%

+2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.40%

22.63%

+2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.04%

27.52%

+0.52%

Dividends

EIX vs. QSR - Dividend Comparison

EIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than QSR's 3.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIX
Edison International
4.65%5.51%2.93%4.19%4.46%3.94%4.10%3.28%4.28%3.53%2.75%2.93%
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
3.45%3.63%3.56%2.82%3.34%3.49%3.40%3.14%3.44%1.27%1.30%1.18%

Financials

EIX vs. QSR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Edison International and Restaurant Brands International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
4.10B
2.26B
(EIX) Total Revenue
(QSR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EIX vs. QSR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Edison International and Restaurant Brands International Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
EIX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Edison International reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

QSR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

EIX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Edison International reported an operating income of 1.07B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.

QSR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported an operating income of 606.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.

EIX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Edison International reported a net income of 570.00M and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.

QSR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a net income of 338.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EIX and QSR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIX has higher volatility (6.88%) compared to QSR (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIX dropped -72.18% vs QSR's -63.03%.

EIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIX and QSR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer