EIS vs. IFLO
EIS (iShares MSCI Israel ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, EIS returned 32.06% vs 32.28% for IFLO. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EIS charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.
Performance
EIS vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIS achieves a 9.55% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 16.93% return.
EIS
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -12.15%
- YTD
- 9.55%
- 6M
- 7.17%
- 1Y
- 32.06%
- 3Y*
- 32.31%
- 5Y*
- 12.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.88%
IFLO
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 6M
- 16.46%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EIS vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EIS iShares MSCI Israel ETF | 9.55% | 20.55% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 16.93% | 13.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIS and IFLO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.43 |
EIS vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EIS
IFLO
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Financial Services
EIS
IFLO
Technology
EIS
IFLO
Industrials
EIS
IFLO
Healthcare
EIS
IFLO
Real Estate
EIS
IFLO
Utilities
EIS
IFLO
Consumer Cyclical
EIS
IFLO
Communication Services
EIS
IFLO
Energy
EIS
IFLO
Consumer Defensive
EIS
IFLO
Basic Materials
EIS
IFLO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIS vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank
EIS
IFLO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EIS vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EIS | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EIS vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIS drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIS and IFLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIS | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.94% | -6.44% | -45.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.69% | -6.44% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.46% | -3.37% | -9.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.89% | -1.25% | -12.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.11% | — | — |
Volatility
EIS vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIS | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.14% | 14.75% | +8.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.18% | 14.75% | +7.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 14.75% | +6.48% |
EIS vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
EIS vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison
EIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than IFLO's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIS iShares MSCI Israel ETF | 1.55% | 1.44% | 1.38% | 1.39% | 1.66% | 1.04% | 0.16% | 2.06% | 0.87% | 2.02% | 1.78% | 2.55% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.51% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIS and IFLO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 32.28% vs 32.06% for EIS. On fees, IFLO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 32.28% return vs 32.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFLO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EIS.
EIS has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 1.51% for IFLO.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EIS and 0.56% for IFLO.
Find the right allocation for EIS and IFLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer