PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIS vs. IDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIS vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIS achieves a 18.19% return, which is significantly higher than IDOG's 14.02% return. Over the past 10 years, EIS has outperformed IDOG with an annualized return of 11.97%, while IDOG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.99% annualized return.


EIS

1D
-1.92%
1M
-2.12%
YTD
18.19%
6M
22.47%
1Y
54.91%
3Y*
37.61%
5Y*
15.32%
10Y*
11.97%

IDOG

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.24%
YTD
14.02%
6M
16.64%
1Y
35.52%
3Y*
21.96%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIS vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIS
iShares MSCI Israel ETF
18.19%45.11%34.50%5.48%-27.05%22.83%12.01%20.93%-4.84%12.77%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
14.02%39.94%1.35%23.57%-4.50%11.33%-1.78%21.93%-13.47%25.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EIS and IDOG is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2013

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between EIS and IDOG has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EIS vs. IDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EIS
IDOG

Financial Services

34.6%
11.0%

Technology

17.8%
8.5%

Industrials

10.9%
11.7%

Healthcare

9.8%
9.3%

Real Estate

9.1%

-

Utilities

6.6%
10.0%

Communication Services

2.7%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

2.5%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
9.4%

Energy

2.0%
10.7%

Basic Materials

1.8%
10.0%

Financial Services

EIS
34.6%
IDOG
11.0%

Technology

EIS
17.8%
IDOG
8.5%

Industrials

EIS
10.9%
IDOG
11.7%

Healthcare

EIS
9.8%
IDOG
9.3%

Real Estate

EIS
9.1%
IDOG

-

Utilities

EIS
6.6%
IDOG
10.0%

Communication Services

EIS
2.7%
IDOG
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EIS
2.5%
IDOG
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

EIS
2.3%
IDOG
9.4%

Energy

EIS
2.0%
IDOG
10.7%

Basic Materials

EIS
1.8%
IDOG
10.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIS vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIS
EIS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

IDOG
IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIS vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EISIDOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.45

5.51

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.54

19.31

-2.77

EIS vs. IDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIS Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the IDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIS and IDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EISIDOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.68

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.86

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.63

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.51

-0.19

Drawdowns

EIS vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIS drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, which is greater than IDOG's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIS and IDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EISIDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.94%

-37.32%

-14.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.40%

-6.47%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.10%

-13.92%

-10.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.88%

-25.31%

-16.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.88%

-37.32%

-4.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.56%

-0.47%

-5.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.90%

-7.93%

-5.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

1.84%

+1.49%

Volatility

EIS vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) at 4.13%. This indicates that EIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EISIDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

4.13%

+2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.05%

10.09%

+5.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.56%

13.33%

+9.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.81%

15.61%

+6.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.08%

17.45%

+3.63%

EIS vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIS vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison

EIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than IDOG's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIS
iShares MSCI Israel ETF
1.22%1.44%1.38%1.39%1.66%1.04%0.16%2.06%0.87%2.02%1.78%2.55%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
3.42%4.26%4.90%4.86%4.46%3.85%3.00%5.41%4.50%3.33%4.01%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIS and IDOG have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIS has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to IDOG (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIS dropped -51.94% vs IDOG's -37.32%.

On 10-year performance, EIS leads with 11.97% vs 10.99% for IDOG. On fees, IDOG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EIS has performed better with a 11.97% return vs 10.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDOG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EIS.

IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 1.22% for EIS.

EIS tracks MSCI Israel Capped Investable Market Index (Net), while IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EIS and 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIS and IDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer