EIPX vs. POW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

EIPX (FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EIPX is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EIPX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

EIPX vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIPX achieves a 23.75% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.

EIPX

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: 1.34%
• 6M: 21.86%
• YTD: 23.75%
• 1Y: 28.81%
• 3Y*: 20.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

POW

• 1D: -3.60%
• 1M: -8.76%
• 6M: 31.71%
• YTD: 38.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIPX vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	23.75%	1.26%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	38.93%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between EIPX and POW is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.10

Return for Risk

EIPX vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIPX

EIPX Risk / Return Rank: 91
EIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
EIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
EIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
EIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
EIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIPX vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EIPX	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.63	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.60	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.60	—	—

Drawdowns

EIPX vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPX drawdown since its inception was -15.43%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPX and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	EIPX	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.43%	-18.37%	+2.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.16%	-18.37%	+17.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-4.33%	+2.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EIPX	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.77%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.46%	32.94%	-21.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.02%	32.94%	-17.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.02%	32.94%	-17.92%

EIPX vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

EIPX vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

EIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	2.71%	3.23%	3.27%	3.48%	0.34%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EIPX and POW in my portfolio?

EIPX and POW have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EIPX or POW?

On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EIPX or POW?

POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EIPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EIPX or POW?

EIPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between EIPX and POW?

EIPX is categorized as Energy Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EIPX and 0.75% for POW.