PortfoliosLab logo
EIPX vs. IXC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EIPX and IXC is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

EIPX vs. IXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EIPX:

0.54

IXC:

-0.31

Sortino Ratio

EIPX:

0.75

IXC:

-0.35

Omega Ratio

EIPX:

1.11

IXC:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

EIPX:

0.59

IXC:

-0.43

Martin Ratio

EIPX:

2.06

IXC:

-1.26

Ulcer Index

EIPX:

4.42%

IXC:

6.45%

Daily Std Dev

EIPX:

18.31%

IXC:

22.06%

Max Drawdown

EIPX:

-15.43%

IXC:

-67.88%

Current Drawdown

EIPX:

-5.99%

IXC:

-11.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIPX achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly higher than IXC's -0.65% return.


EIPX

YTD

2.33%

1M

3.19%

6M

-4.72%

1Y

9.81%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

IXC

YTD

-0.65%

1M

2.21%

6M

-8.20%

1Y

-6.86%

3Y*

2.08%

5Y*

18.45%

10Y*

4.43%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares Global Energy ETF

EIPX vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.46% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EIPX vs. IXC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIPX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EIPX is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EIPX is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EIPX is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EIPX is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EIPX is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EIPX is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

IXC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IXC is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IXC is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IXC is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IXC is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IXC is 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IXC is 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EIPX vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EIPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the IXC Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIPX and IXC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

EIPX vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison

EIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, less than IXC's 4.60% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EIPX
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF
3.37%3.27%3.48%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
4.60%4.57%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%3.02%

Drawdowns

EIPX vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPX drawdown since its inception was -15.43%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPX and IXC.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

EIPX vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) is 3.38%, while iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that EIPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...