PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIPX vs. HDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EIPX vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EIPX vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EIPX
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF
22.41%11.44%19.11%10.74%0.56%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
12.30%11.90%14.16%1.72%4.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIPX achieves a 22.41% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 12.30% return.


EIPX

1D
-0.56%
1M
3.08%
YTD
22.41%
6M
24.64%
1Y
27.37%
3Y*
21.37%
5Y*
10Y*

HDV

1D
0.24%
1M
-2.54%
YTD
12.30%
6M
12.67%
1Y
15.69%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EIPX vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EIPX vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIPX
EIPX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
EIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIPX vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIPXHDVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

1.24

+0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

1.70

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.25

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

1.65

+0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.25

6.01

+2.24

EIPX vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIPX and HDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIPXHDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.24

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

0.73

+0.54

Correlation

The correlation between EIPX and HDV is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EIPX vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

EIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than HDV's 2.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIPX
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF
2.67%3.23%3.27%3.48%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
2.92%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%

Drawdowns

EIPX vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPX drawdown since its inception was -15.43%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPX and HDV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EIPXHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.43%

-37.04%

+21.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.87%

-10.04%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-2.58%

+1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-3.09%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

2.88%

+0.51%

Volatility

EIPX vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) have volatilities of 2.90% and 2.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EIPXHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

2.94%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.10%

7.06%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.29%

12.79%

+3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.19%

12.78%

+2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.19%

15.70%

-0.51%