EINC vs. PWRZ
EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) and PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. EINC is passively managed, while PWRZ is actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EINC charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PWRZ.
Performance
EINC vs. PWRZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EINC
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 5.79%
- 6M
- 28.55%
- YTD
- 29.71%
- 1Y
- 33.52%
- 3Y*
- 29.16%
- 5Y*
- 23.13%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
PWRZ
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EINC vs. PWRZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 2.51% |
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | -0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between EINC and PWRZ is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EINC vs. PWRZ — Risk / Return Rank
EINC
PWRZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EINC vs. PWRZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EINC | PWRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.27 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.48 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EINC vs. PWRZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EINC drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, which is greater than PWRZ's maximum drawdown of -1.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EINC and PWRZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EINC | PWRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.55% | -1.21% | -86.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -1.21% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.97% | -0.42% | -43.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | — | — |
Volatility
EINC vs. PWRZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EINC | PWRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.38% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.45% | 12.75% | +2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 12.75% | +6.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.33% | 12.75% | +12.58% |
EINC vs. PWRZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EINC has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EINC vs. PWRZ - Dividend Comparison
EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, while PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.41% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EINC and PWRZ have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRZ.
EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EINC and 0.75% for PWRZ.
Find the right allocation for EINC and PWRZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer