EIMI.L vs. IBTM.L
EIMI.L (iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF) and IBTM.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - EIMI.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, while IBTM.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EIMI.L returned 10.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for IBTM.L. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. EIMI.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTM.L.
Performance
EIMI.L vs. IBTM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EIMI.L is traded in USD, while IBTM.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IBTM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIMI.L achieves a 22.83% return, which is significantly higher than IBTM.L's -0.89% return. Over the past 10 years, EIMI.L has outperformed IBTM.L with an annualized return of 10.60%, while IBTM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 0.65% annualized return.
EIMI.L
- 1D
- 3.53%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 22.83%
- 6M
- 26.10%
- 1Y
- 43.20%
- 3Y*
- 21.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.60%
IBTM.L
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- -0.89%
- 6M
- -0.39%
- 1Y
- 3.30%
- 3Y*
- 2.85%
- 5Y*
- -1.11%
- 10Y*
- 0.65%
EIMI.L vs. IBTM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 22.83% | 32.16% | 7.36% | 11.03% | -19.67% | -0.65% | 18.80% | 16.37% | -14.18% | 36.94% |
IBTM.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) | -0.89% | 8.50% | -0.23% | 2.90% | -14.92% | -2.66% | 9.27% | 9.73% | 0.47% | 2.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIMI.L and IBTM.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2014 | -0.14 |
The correlation between EIMI.L and IBTM.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (all time) to 0.05 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIMI.L vs. IBTM.L — Risk / Return Rank
EIMI.L
IBTM.L
EIMI.L vs. IBTM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EIMI.L | IBTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.10 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 0.79 | +2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.76 | 2.26 | +9.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EIMI.L vs. IBTM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIMI.L drawdown since its inception was -38.73%, smaller than the maximum IBTM.L drawdown of -53.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIMI.L and IBTM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIMI.L | IBTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.73% | -53.26% | +14.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.66% | -4.18% | -8.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.44% | -7.61% | -9.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.45% | -21.13% | -14.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.73% | -23.64% | -15.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -20.74% | +16.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.99% | -29.38% | +15.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 1.46% | +2.20% |
Volatility
EIMI.L vs. IBTM.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a higher volatility of 8.37% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) at 1.97%. This indicates that EIMI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIMI.L | IBTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.37% | 1.97% | +6.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.62% | 4.20% | +13.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.94% | 5.76% | +14.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 8.51% | +9.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 7.83% | +11.37% |
EIMI.L vs. IBTM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIMI.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTM.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EIMI.L vs. IBTM.L - Dividend Comparison
EIMI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBTM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBTM.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) | 4.36% | 4.19% | 3.94% | 3.16% | 1.96% | 1.14% | 1.69% | 2.53% | 2.34% | 2.02% | 1.79% | 1.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIMI.L and IBTM.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTM.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTM.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EIMI.L.
EIMI.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IBTM.L is Government Bonds. EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, while IBTM.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EIMI.L and 0.07% for IBTM.L.
Find the right allocation for EIMI.L and IBTM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer